Back to @maziibe_'s profile

Ibe πŸŽ’ engagement report

@maziibe_ - 396K followers on X

Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.091%
of 396K followers
Per impression
0.534%
67K views on a typical post
Reach
17.0%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
360
interactions (median)
Saved
0.016%
11 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.8/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 360 interactions against 396K followers, an engagement rate of 0.091%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 52% of 3,775 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 67K times each, and 0.534% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 17.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 53% carry an image or video and 5% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 28K interactions, about 78x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #efc, #mcfc.

Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026. Recurring tags: #efc, #mcfc.

Compared with accounts its own size

Ibe πŸŽ’'s engagement rate beats 52% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,775 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 27% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.091%, Ibe πŸŽ’ sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.08% to 0.433%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.433%
p902.10%
p99160.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,654 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,977 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.433%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-3%98K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-1%57K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%231K
Monday0%288K
Tuesday-2%278K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%245K
Friday-3%253K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 28, 202678x their median

    Sydney Talker drops a new SKIT πŸ˜­πŸ˜‚ https://t.co/9tM9syGwp0

    26K1.9K25857508K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202657x their median

    🚨 EXCL: Manchester City reach agreement in principle to sign Iliman Ndiaye. Deal for 26yo attacker Β£65m package + in process of being finalised; medical expected Tuesday morning. At paperwork stage before Senegal int’l joins #MCFC from #EFC @TheAthleticFC https://t.co/trypfCitdV

    15K2.1K1.1K2.2K1.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202642x their median

    So what name did they give Lacroix in the viewing center last night? 🀣🀣

    14K581489123408K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202619x their median

    Music Money Or Football Money which one is longer? https://t.co/6Ojooh9XrX

    5.6K92920184110K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202618x their median

    I’m looking form a pressure group against Semo. It’s like a club and our work is simply to work to ensure the world bans Semo.

    3.8K1.3K633726224K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 202611x their median

    All traffic lights were green till I got to my destination this morning 8 traffic lights all green. Very rare. I’m now tempted to open SportyBet https://t.co/a0TbSRETph

    3.6K3638023105K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20263.6x their median

    On a scale of 1–10, what would you rate Homeland? https://t.co/t6WlFE6IDP

    57299402209146K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20263.1x their median

    SOM3 OF US N3V3R L3FT. https://t.co/GqewWJecXi

    530734536863K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20262.6x their median

    You just know a good time was had https://t.co/KTBU4kZhck

    7401031376376K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 2026

    fun fact: when I was banning people from @boostdotgg and @PulseInfra it was literally 100% of users from 3 countries: - Nigeria - India - Vietnam yet 1 year later only people from one country is still pissed while the other 2 are over it and making money elsewhere is it a cultural thing or why my nigerian homies still so angry?

    16511118368K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#efc#mcfc

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 360 interactions against 396K followers, an engagement rate of 0.091%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 52% of 3,775 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 67K times each, and 0.534% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 17.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 53% carry an image or video and 5% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 28K interactions, about 78x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #efc, #mcfc.

What is Ibe πŸŽ’'s engagement rate on X?
Ibe πŸŽ’ (@maziibe_) has an engagement rate of 0.091%, based on the median interactions across 19 original posts from the last 30 days against 396,498 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.091%, Ibe πŸŽ’ sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @maziibe_ have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 52% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,775 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @maziibe_ post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.8 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going