Back to @megynkelly's profile

Megyn Kelly engagement report

@megynkelly - 3.6M followers on X

Measured over 63 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.01%
of 3.6M followers
Per impression
0.316%
120K views on a typical post
Reach
3.30%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
379
interactions (median)
Saved
0.021%
25 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.8/day
active 67% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 379 interactions against 3.6M followers, an engagement rate of 0.01%. Measured over 63 original posts, its engagement rate beats 46% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 120K times each, and 0.316% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.30% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 63 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video and 32% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 104K interactions, about 275x its own typical post.

Measured over 63 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Megyn Kelly's engagement rate beats 46% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 28% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.01%, Megyn Kelly sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.434%
p902.10%
p99160.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,521 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,166 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.434%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%230K
Monday0%286K
Tuesday-2%276K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%244K
Friday-3%252K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 8, 2026275x their median

    JUST IN: WNBA Commissioner announces the league is meeting to review what a woman is, after multiple former NBA stars announced plans to join the league.

    88K6.4K5.1K5.0K17M viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 2026246x their median

    If Sophie Cunningham had clotheslined a black player attempting a layup, been kicked out of the game, and then tweeted black privilege from the locker room, @wnba would have already suspended her for the season and maybe banned her for life. We all know this is true.

    83K8.6K9692261.6M viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 2026191x their median

    After two former first round NBA draft picks declared for @wnba draft, the WNBA’s commissioner says the league will be meeting to review what a woman is for purposes of league eligibility. These meetings need to be streamed live. That’s must see TV. https://t.co/wEdwVa05Up

    59K9.1K3.2K1.0K3.8M viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 2026126x their median

    Massachusetts Governor Maura Healey signs the bill for abortions up to birth as Democrats celebrate. https://t.co/BlfTobYbeD

    12K5.8K20K11K27M viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 2026112x their median

    Ossoff was clearly implying that Trump is having an affair w/his staffer. He was so determined to disparage Trump, he didn’t give one thought (or worse, he did) to how this would affect Natalie. Forever. Don’t let the Democrats tell you they are for women. It’s a lie.

    30K3.7K8.6K6362.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 202661x their median

    Today is the day we remember Ann Widdecombe. Ann was an extraordinary woman who left a serious mark on British politics. She will be sorely missed. Rest in peace, Ann. https://t.co/GCCyz4ILNi

    20K2.5K53285222K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202660x their median

    Dolly Parton seemed as close to total goodness as any mere mortal could come. She united us all in our love and admiration for her and, now, in mourning her. God bless you Dolly. R.I.P.

    21K71761020292K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 202648x their median

    BREAKING: Guardian's Katharine Viner was warned Arday was at risk - yet published anyway Author Kelechi Okafor released a series of internal emails showing the Guardian knew how vulnerable Arday was, yet ignored warnings https://t.co/t6ZiO36z76 https://t.co/t6ZiO36z76

    12K4.7K1.2K3641.8M viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 202636x their median

    DiJonai Carrington is the daughter Darren Carrington who played Safety for 8 years in the NFL. She went to a private school in San Diego growing up with more opportunities than most Americans could ever dream of. She went to college at Stanford which is where she likely picked up on her crazy notions of White privilege despite being economically privileged herself. SHE IS PRIVILEGED!! All these females who cry wolf and talk bit racist this and racist that grow up never seeing any of it. They all went to private schools all had both parents all came from money y’all letting these people play you and create all this hostility for nothing @Reese10Angel @aja22wilsonHQ @DijonaiVictoria I have the black in a chokehold with their poor me stories these females have never struggled a day in their life

    12K1.6K26894610K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 202634x their median

    I was just on @CBSNews The Takeout with @MajorCBS. I was there to talk about the WNBA - what else. I was introduced as the head of @xx_xyathletics, "an advocacy organization." Correction 1: We are an athletic clothing brand. We are not a non-profit. We are a business. A brand. And brands influence the culture. Nike takes all sorts of positions. The difference between us and Nike is we mean what we say. We stand up for women when it is hard. When there is no upside in it for us. Nike takes their supposed stances as a marketing play ("woke capitalism"). And they go the opposite direction when the wind blows that way. He then said our mission was to "keep trans out of women's sports." Correction 2: No. Our mission is to stand up for female athletes, not just pretend to like Nike -- a brand that makes money off of "championing" female athletes while treating them with astonishing disregard. (See: Mary Cain, Alyson Felix for examples.) We don't care if women who identify as trans (think they are men) play in women's sports. We don't care if women who declare a non-binary identity play in women's sports. Women like Nikki Hiltz. Or Layshia Clarendon. They are women. It's all good! We don't want men in women's sports. Not "trans identified" men. Not DSD men. MEN. No men in women's sports. 80% of Americans agree with us. This isn't culture war stuff. This is 80% of Americans being normal and 20% living in a misogynistic fantasy land where men can declare themselves women and take our privacy and opportunities away. Thank you for having me but just needed to correct the record on my intro.

    11K2.0K15454166K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 379 interactions against 3.6M followers, an engagement rate of 0.01%. Measured over 63 original posts, its engagement rate beats 46% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 120K times each, and 0.316% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.30% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 63 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video and 32% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 104K interactions, about 275x its own typical post.

What is Megyn Kelly's engagement rate on X?
Megyn Kelly (@megynkelly) has an engagement rate of 0.01%, based on the median interactions across 63 original posts from the last 30 days against 3,634,501 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.01%, Megyn Kelly sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @megynkelly have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 46% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @megynkelly post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.8 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going