Back to @metaversejoji's profile

joji engagement report

@metaversejoji - 264K followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 30, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.051%
of 264K followers
Per impression
0.501%
27K views on a typical post
Reach
10.1%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
134
interactions (median)
Saved
0.039%
10 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.5/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 134 interactions against 264K followers, an engagement rate of 0.051%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 47% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 27K times each, and 0.501% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.5 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 38% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.8K interactions, about 66x its own typical post.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 30, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

joji's engagement rate beats 47% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 26% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.051%, joji sits above the 25th percentile of the 217,973 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.149%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.149%
p750.705%
p902.63%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 217,973 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 21,723 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.149%
75th percentile0.705%
90th percentile2.63%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video38% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 38% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 99 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jan 17, 202566x their median

    believe in something https://t.co/TNz9RwtshQ

    7.7K2227421772.0M viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 202627x their median

    having a job is like holding 0.00001 % of a shitcoin while you work your bags the hardest and the dev owns 99% of the supply and only he is allowed to sell plus your tokens are locked until you’re 65 and by then the dev has already rugged the project

    3.0K43412057204K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 202616x their median

    if you're having a bad day Closed my $neiro position only 5 days before it got listed on Binance Held for 2 months, would have been $2k -> $3m trade if I held it just five more days https://t.co/F9maQLJKPI

    1.8K6021517211K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 202614x their median

    Seeing a lot of very young ppl with high unrealized gains, quick thought If you make $500K on a memecoin or whatever here and you're 20 years old, walk away It'll be super tempting to try and flip that into $5 million and make crypto into your career and life's purpose, but you've already won You have time and compound interest on your side. If you put that $500K into the most boring boomer stocks and live your life as if crypto didn't exist then: When you turn 27 your account will be $1 million, when you're 34, $2 million (top-1% of all households) You'll have bankable skills, good friends, less stress At 34 you'll still be super young and your friends'll be like "how the hell are you so rich?" You'll say you bought a dumb memecoin 14 years ago and instead of gambling more, you listened to Untamed Adam's advice and took the generational win

    1.5K8518744241K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20268.3x their median

    PVE https://t.co/M14gWQdnS9

    1.0K1974591K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20267.9x their median

    499$ and a dream https://t.co/ktegIIJsW7

    95324756103K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20267.4x their median

    one key mistake I’ve learned a lot from myself & other people last cycle early bull you need to be delusional and moon boy your belief bags into oblivion don’t wait for a new ceiling because you might have the next ceiling breaker and it will be your retire play and then you have to do the exact opposite when everyone is used to 100M-500M-1B-5B coins that’s when you have to start taking profit agressive because ceilings will only lower from there something a lot of you might end up doing the opposite so thought i’d share be delusional when others are reasonable be reasonable when others are delusional

    8436185995K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20267.3x their median

    big props to @brezscales he just hit a 100x https://t.co/XSPPGi8PWO

    8911365480K viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 20266.3x their median

    can’t legit buy any coin above 20k marketcap anymore

    68727119768K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20266.2x their median

    Anyone try copytrade "dev"? I always see him buying tokens early https://t.co/8GpE6NgCMS

    7393942577K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 134 interactions against 264K followers, an engagement rate of 0.051%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 47% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 27K times each, and 0.501% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.5 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 38% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.8K interactions, about 66x its own typical post.

What is joji's engagement rate on X?
joji (@metaversejoji) has an engagement rate of 0.051%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 264,496 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.051%, joji sits above the 25th percentile of the 217,973 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @metaversejoji have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 47% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @metaversejoji post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.5 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going