Back to @mohammedhanif's profile

Mohammed Hanif engagement report

@mohammedhanif - 386K followers on X

Measured over 3 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.2%
of 386K followers
Per impression
0.945%
82K views on a typical post
Reach
21.2%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
772
interactions (median)
Saved
0.072%
59 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.83/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Monday

Early reading. We have captured 3 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 772 interactions against 386K followers, an engagement rate of 0.2%. Posts are seen about 82K times each, and 0.945% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 21.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.83 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 3 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video and 33% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.0K interactions, about 2.6x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #junaidhafeez, #lahore, #pakistan. Only 3 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 3 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026. Recurring tags: #junaidhafeez, #lahore, #pakistan.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.2%, Mohammed Hanif sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,856 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.081% to 0.439%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99155.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,856 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 97,248 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile155.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%53K
01:00 UTC-2%54K
02:00 UTC-3%52K
03:00 UTC-4%56K
04:00 UTC-6%45K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%63K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%75K
11:00 UTC-3%82K
12:00 UTC-2%90K
13:00 UTC-2%99K
14:00 UTC-3%102K
15:00 UTC-2%105K
16:00 UTC-4%103K
17:00 UTC-3%95K
18:00 UTC-1%89K
19:00 UTC-2%84K
20:00 UTC-1%78K
21:00 UTC-1%69K
22:00 UTC-2%60K
23:00 UTC-2%54K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%239K
Monday0%303K
Tuesday-3%305K
Wednesday-1%259K
Thursday-2%251K
Friday-3%260K
Saturday+3%234K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 6, 20262.6x their median

    Insight: As Pakistan's army chief turns on hardline Islamist groups, blasphemy cases plummet https://t.co/sH1k9vCxve https://t.co/sH1k9vCxve

    1.2K281363187792K viewsView on X
  • Jul 12, 20262.0x their median

    Dawn newspaper told her to stick to cooking and child-rearing. She built her own magazine instead. And used it to bring down a military dictator. Zaib-un-Nissa Hamidullah. Born December 1918 in Calcutta. Daughter of Syed Wajid Ali, a Cambridge-educated writer who translated Tagore into English and Iqbal into Bengali. A family that breathed literature. She published her first poem in The Illustrated Weekly of India in 1933 at age 15. At 18 she won a poetry competition in England's Daily Mirror. After partition she moved to Karachi with her husband and began writing a column for Dawn. She became Pakistan's first female political commentator. Her editor let her write on the condition she stuck to feminine matters. She wrote about politics anyway. In 1951 the Dawn editor sent her a letter. It is still in the archives. Dear Mrs. Hamidullah. You will have noticed that we could not use your article last week. The reason was that it dealt with problems other than feminine. She read the letter. Resigned. And in 1952 founded her own magazine. The Mirror. Pakistan's first female editor and publisher. Her own press. Her own voice. No editor to answer to. In 1955 she became the first woman to address Al-Azhar University in Cairo. One of the oldest universities on earth. She spoke about Kashmir. The audience was shocked. Thrilled. Divided. She did not care. In 1957 she published a ferocious editorial defending Prime Minister Suhrawardy after Iskander Mirza forced him out. The government banned the Mirror for six months. Advised her to apologise. She took them to the Supreme Court instead. She won. First woman journalist in Pakistan to successfully challenge press censorship in court. In October 1962 she published Please Mr. President. An open letter to Ayub Khan about the blood staining Pakistan's streets after student protests. She printed his photo upside down as a sign of protest. Ayub Khan called her rashly emotional. Then replied publicly to her letter. Because even he knew she could not be ignored. The Mirror was banned twice. Government advertising was withdrawn. She kept publishing. In 1969 she reprinted Please Mr. President alongside a new editorial. No, thank you, Sir. Pakistan will continue to erupt as long as you remain its President. Ayub Khan abdicated months later. A street in Karachi is named after her. Zaibunnisa Street. Previously called Elphinstone Street. Named by the British. Renamed for a woman who spent her life defying exactly their kind of power. She died September 10, 2000. The editor who told her to write about cooking accidentally created Pakistan's most fearless journalist. Zaib-un-Nissa Hamidullah. Pakistan Zindabad. 🇵🇰

    1.1K3503846128K viewsView on X
  • Jun 22, 20261.7x their median

    HRCP deplores the conviction of @MahrangBaloch_ and other members of the BYC. Regrettably, the state has continued its policy of dealing with advocacy for fundamental rights in the same way as it deals with militancy, leading to executive and judicial decisions that are lopsided and prejudiced. We demand a review of the ATC's decision at the earliest and the initiation of a political dialogue in Balochistan.

    7343811802934K viewsView on X
  • Jun 6, 20261.5x their median

    ''ਜ਼ਿੰਦਗੀ 'ਚ ਬਹੁਤ ਨਸੀਬਾਂ ਵਾਲੇ ਲੋਕ ਦੇਖੇ ਪਰ ਪਾਕਿਸਤਾਨ ਦੇ ਸਾਬਕਾ PM ਨਵਾਜ਼ ਸ਼ਰੀਫ਼ ਵਰਗਾ ਨਸੀਬ ਨਹੀਂ ਦੇਖਿਆ,'' ਗਿਲਗਿਤ-ਬਲਤਿਸਤਾਨ ਚੋਣਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਲੈ ਕੇ ਸਿਆਸੀ ਆਗੂਆਂ ਵੱਲੋਂ ਵੋਟਾਂ ਮੰਗੀਆਂ ਜਾ ਰਹੀਆਂ ਹਨ ਜਿਸ 'ਤੇ ਲੇਖਕ ਤੇ ਸੀਨੀਅਰ ਪੱਤਰਕਾਰ ਮੁਹੰਮਦ ਹਨੀਫ਼ ਨੇ ਟਿੱਪਣੀ ਕੀਤੀ #Pakistan #NawazSharif #GilgitBaltistan https://t.co/T6PUgbELh0

    8163113227187K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 2026

    @AsadAToor presenting himself for NCCIA summons, accompanied by his lawyer… https://t.co/McgZJPSA4Y

    6655742882K viewsView on X
  • Jul 25, 2026

    ਦਿੱਲੀ ਵਿੱਚ ਚੱਲ ਰਹੇ ਕਾਕਰੋਚ ਜਨਤਾ ਪਾਰਟੀ ਦੇ ਪ੍ਰਦਰਸ਼ਨ ਨੂੰ ਲੈ ਕੇ ਪਾਕਿਸਤਾਨ ਤੋਂ ਜੋ ਪ੍ਰਤੀਕਰਮ ਸਾਹਮਣੇ ਆ ਰਹੇ ਹਨ, ਉਸ 'ਤੇ ਸੀਨੀਅਰ ਪੱਤਰਕਾਰ ਮੁਹੰਮਦ ਹਨੀਫ਼ ਦਾ ਵਲੌਗ #MohammedHanif #vlog https://t.co/KgHs3p5yNm

    28576111873K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 2026

    ਪਾਕਿਸਤਾਨ ਦੇ ਲਾਹੌਰ ਸ਼ਹਿਰ ਦੇ ਕਲਚਰ ਬਾਰੇ ਹੋਈਆਂ ਬਿਆਨਬਾਜ਼ੀਆਂ ਬਾਰੇ ਸੀਨੀਅਰ ਪੱਤਰਕਾਰ ਅਤੇ ਲੇਖਕ ਮੁਹੰਮਦ ਹਨੀਫ਼ ਨੇ ਟਿੱਪਣੀ ਕੀਤੀ ਹੈ। ਉਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਨੇ ਕੀ ਕਿਹਾ ਹੈ, ਸੁਣੋ ਇਸ ਵਲੌਗ ਵਿੱਚ.... @Muhammedhanif ਐਡਿਟ:ਰਾਜਨ ਪਪਨੇਜਾ #Pakistan #Punjab #lahore https://t.co/nx5kae1Lks

    2336912849K viewsView on X
  • Jun 15, 2026

    PRESS RELEASE Through this important press conference today, the legal team representing Dr. @MahrangBaloch_ and her detained colleagues seeks to draw the attention of the public, the media, the legal community, human rights organizations, and relevant authorities to the serious legal and constitutional concerns that have continued to emerge throughout the proceedings against Dr. Mahrang Baloch and her colleagues. We wish to underscore, with deep concern, that despite the passage of more than fourteen months, Dr. Mahrang Baloch and her colleagues have not been provided meaningful access to a transparent, fair, and open judicial process. During this period, the nature of the cases and the judicial procedures governing them have repeatedly changed. Administrative detention, the registration of multiple cases, repeated physical remands, jail trials, and now trial proceedings conducted through video link have all formed part of this process. A fundamental legal requirement is that justice must not only be done, but must also be seen to be done. Open court hearings, public scrutiny, and transparent judicial proceedings are essential principles of a fair trial. Following jail trials, the decision to conduct proceedings via video link has further restricted transparency and public access, raising serious concerns regarding the fairness of the proceedings. In this context, it is important to note that serious legal and constitutional concerns had already been raised regarding the “faceless courts” system introduced last year. Under this system, judicial proceedings are conducted through a restricted and remote process rather than through traditional open hearings, resulting in persistent concerns about transparency, public oversight, and fair trial guarantees. The decision to prosecute Dr. Mahrang Baloch and her colleagues through online proceedings in a faceless court has only reinforced these concerns. We also wish to place on record that the detained leaders have repeatedly expressed reservations regarding the judicial environment and the conduct of proceedings during the jail trial. On the basis of these concerns, a formal application seeking the transfer of the case from the current judge has already been filed before the court and requires an immediate and fair hearing. It is particularly troubling that, despite having been filed four months ago, the application remains pending. In matters of this nature, prompt adjudication is generally considered an essential requirement of justice. The legal team is also concerned that the principle of judicial impartiality is being compromised during the proceedings. Furthermore, during the previous hearing, the Prosecutor General was present alongside the state prosecutor and reportedly adopted an extremely harsh tone toward the judge, pressuring the court to deliver a conviction as quickly as possible. This has further intensified concerns regarding the fairness of the trial. In addition, more than fifteen cases relating to Section 144 restrictions have been registered in various districts of Balochistan. Efforts are reportedly underway to transfer these cases to Anti-Terrorism Courts (ATCs), raising concerns that the detention of the incarcerated leaders and the legal proceedings against them may be unnecessarily prolonged. At present, Dr. Mahrang and her colleagues are protesting inside prison against the use of video-link trials. Their position is that their cases should be heard in an open court in accordance with the Constitution and the law. As lawyers, it is our duty to defend our clients’ legal, constitutional, and fundamental rights and to raise these concerns before every available legal forum. Through this press conference, we announce the following demands: * The immediate termination of online and jail trials, and the transfer of proceedings to an open court so that judicial processes are transparent, subject to public scrutiny, and consistent with principles of public access. * An immediate hearing on the pending application seeking the replacement of the presiding judge, and the assignment of the case to an impartial judge in accordance with the requirements of judicial neutrality. * A stay on further proceedings until the application concerning the change of judge has been decided, so that the interests of justice are not compromised and confidence in the judicial process is maintained. * The protection of Dr. Mahrang Baloch and her colleagues’ legal rights, including access to legal counsel and communication with family members, and an end to all measures that unnecessarily prolong the proceedings. We call upon Pakistan’s legal community, human rights organizations, civil society, political parties, media institutions, and international human rights bodies to take serious notice of this matter and to raise their voices in support of fair trial rights, judicial transparency, and the protection of fundamental constitutional guarantees. The delivery of justice is not merely a legal requirement; it is also a fundamental measure of the credibility of state institutions and the rule of law. We hope that the relevant state authorities will take immediate and effective action to ensure that the requirements of justice are fulfilled, fundamental rights are protected, and public confidence in the judicial system is maintained

    1136451112K viewsView on X
  • May 31, 2026

    Who wants to hang Junaid Hafeez?https://t.co/Dakx4DBql8

    99595814K viewsView on X
  • Jun 20, 2026

    ਈਰਾਨ ਅਤੇ ਅਮਰੀਕਾ ਵਿਚਾਲੇ ਹੋਈ ਡੀਲ ਵਿੱਚ ਪਾਕਿਸਤਾਨ ਦੀ ਭੂਮਿਕਾ ਬਾਰੇ ਸੀਨੀਅਰ ਪੱਤਰਕਾਰ ਅਤੇ ਲੇਖਕ ਮੁਹੰਮਦ ਹਨੀਫ਼ ਦੀ ਟਿੱਪਣੀ (ਇਹ ਵਿਚਾਰ ਲੇਖਕ ਦੇ ਨਿੱਜੀ ਹਨ) #Iran #USA https://t.co/Um9bAZ5hnT

    62243849K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#junaidhafeez#lahore#pakistan#punjab#releaseimaanandhadi

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 772 interactions against 386K followers, an engagement rate of 0.2%. Posts are seen about 82K times each, and 0.945% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 21.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.83 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 3 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video and 33% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.0K interactions, about 2.6x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #junaidhafeez, #lahore, #pakistan. Only 3 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Mohammed Hanif's engagement rate on X?
Mohammed Hanif (@mohammedhanif) has an engagement rate of 0.2%, based on the median interactions across 3 original posts from the last 30 days against 385,532 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.2%, Mohammed Hanif sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,856 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @mohammedhanif have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @mohammedhanif post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.83 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going

Mohammed Hanif (@mohammedhanif) Engagement Rate - 0.2% | PlayerSells