Marjorie Taylor Greene 🇺🇸 engagement report
@mtgreenee - 1.7M followers on X
Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 4.8K interactions against 1.7M followers, an engagement rate of 0.28%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 95% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 251K times each, and 1.90% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 14.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 58% carry an image or video and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 84K interactions, about 18x its own typical post.
Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Marjorie Taylor Greene 🇺🇸's engagement rate beats 95% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 75% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.28%, Marjorie Taylor Greene 🇺🇸 sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.08% to 0.433%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.08% |
| 75th percentile | 0.433% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 160.5% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 51K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 52K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 50K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 53K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 43K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 42K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 48K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 52K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 61K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 70K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 72K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 78K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 86K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 94K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 97K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 101K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 98K |
| 17:00 UTC | -2% | 91K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 85K |
| 19:00 UTC | -1% | 80K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 74K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 66K |
| 22:00 UTC | -1% | 57K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 52K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +4% | 231K |
| Monday | 0% | 288K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 278K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 251K |
| Thursday | -1% | 245K |
| Friday | -3% | 253K |
| Saturday | +3% | 227K |
Best tweets
- Jul 27, 202618x their median
Hop in... best dimension yet. https://t.co/7dRJnUVANc
- Jul 15, 202617x their median
Every Republican Senator voted to merge our military with Israel’s military. The most America LAST thing they could possibly do, selling our military out to a foreign country. It’s absolute treason and betrayal.
- Aug 22, 202614x their median
I ranch with my 85 year old Dad who has been a die hard Trump fan. Whenever I criticize any Trump decision, even slightly, he’ll get personally offended and won’t want to talk about it. So I’ve avoided voicing my disdain over his attacks on Massie, spending, Ag, etc. when Dad is in the room. Today, after the beef import announcement, Dad shook his head, sadly, and said, “you know, I really don’t think he gives a damn about anyone who isn’t rich, and sure not about ranchers. Never wanted to believe that until today.” There wasn’t a more stalwart Trump supporter on the planet. Trump is losing the room.
- Aug 23, 20269.6x their median
In 2025, Trump bailed out Argentina with $20 billion dollars currency swap. Now Trump is going to buy 300,000 metric tons of ground beef apparently from Argentina undercutting the American cattlemen. Trump claims Argentina is dying and they need the help. Actually it’s the American cattle industry that is suffering and dying with an average of 77 cattle producers going out of business every day. Put Americans FIRST!!!
- Aug 23, 20267.0x their median
The government is telling you that you're going to eat foreign ground beef and you're gonna like it and it's gonna lower beef prices. That's about as America LAST as we can get when the president is undercutting our own ranchers. This is outrageous. 🚨 https://t.co/p3CBOQH6z1
- Jul 19, 20266.6x their median
How many days has it been since anyone has seen Mitch McConnell alive?
- Jul 19, 20266.1x their median
Barry Goldwater telling the truth back in 1988 that Israel controls our politicians and our government. And it’s far worse today! But tell me again how Russia and China control our elections. https://t.co/m2Tnanh9SE
- Aug 3, 20265.9x their median
https://t.co/GZngPMeW6z
- Jul 15, 20265.7x their median
Massie siding with Democrats but ultimately failing to pass a law just about sums up his career.
- Aug 17, 20265.5x their median
Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. Fine. No argument. But I demand America not use nuclear weapons. The President and his Secretary of “war” must address this issue and promise the American people they won’t do it. Never again. Remember?
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 4.8K interactions against 1.7M followers, an engagement rate of 0.28%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 95% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 251K times each, and 1.90% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 14.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 58% carry an image or video and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 84K interactions, about 18x its own typical post.
- What is Marjorie Taylor Greene 🇺🇸's engagement rate on X?
- Marjorie Taylor Greene 🇺🇸 (@mtgreenee) has an engagement rate of 0.28%, based on the median interactions across 26 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,700,261 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.28%, Marjorie Taylor Greene 🇺🇸 sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @mtgreenee have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 95% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @mtgreenee post?
- Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.8 posts per day across the measured window.