Back to @mustafasuleyman's profile

Mustafa Suleyman engagement report

@mustafasuleyman - 1.1M followers on X

Measured over 4 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.057%
of 1.1M followers
Per impression
0.768%
78K views on a typical post
Reach
7.42%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
598
interactions (median)
Saved
0.132%
102 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.37/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Tuesday

Early reading. We have captured 4 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 598 interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.057%. Posts are seen about 78K times each, and 0.768% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.39% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.37 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 4 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video and 25% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.2K interactions, about 14x its own typical post. Only 4 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 4 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.057%, Mustafa Suleyman sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.434%
p902.10%
p99160.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,521 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,166 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.434%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%230K
Monday0%286K
Tuesday-2%276K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%244K
Friday-3%252K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jun 2, 202614x their median

    Such a privilege to work with Microsoft to bring claws to enterprises!

    4.7K30913335479K viewsView on X
  • Jun 2, 20267.9x their median

    Super excited to announce seven new world-class MAI models today. They represent what we consider a new era in AI designed to keep you in control and on the frontier. First is our text foundation model, MAI-Thinking-1, exceptionally strong on reasoning and SWE tasks. - It’s a 35B active parameter MoE with a 256K context window. Independent human raters on Surge prefer it for overall quality in blind side-by-sides versus Sonnet 4.6, and it’s achieved 97% on AIME 2025, the key measure of its general-purpose reasoning abilities. - It's at 53% on SWE Bench Pro, placing it right alongside Opus 4.6 on one of the toughest coding benchmarks. - And since we co-designed our models with our own silicon, MAI-Thinking-1 is optimized on our MAIA 200 chip. Benchmarking head-to-head against the GB200, we see 30% better performance per dollar as well as a 1.4x performance-per-watt gain when running our MAI models on the MAIA 200 end-to-end. Next is MAI-Image-2.5 and its Flash variant. Two super strong models now at #2 on the leaderboards, surpassing the score of Nano Banana 2 on image editing. Last for now is MAI-Code-1-Flash, our new inference efficient coding model, especially tuned for VS Code and GitHub Copilot CLI. - Code-1-Flash achieves 51% on SWE Bench Pro, despite having just 5B parameters, putting it closer to Haiku in size but cheaper in cost. All of this is the foundation for Microsoft Frontier Tuning. It lets you customize our models to create custom, company-specific agents that only you control. You can make our model, your model. Your data. Your agents. Your moat. Early adopters are already seeing a difference. When we tuned our models for McKinsey’s tasks, MAI delivered the highest win rate, outperforming GPT-5.5 on quality, while being 10x lower on cost. Also really excited to be collaborating with the amazing team at Mayo Clinic to jointly train a new frontier AI model for healthcare. Our announcements today mark another milestone on the road to humanist superintelligence. You can learn more and about our other new models in our latest blog: https://t.co/v65eop5Ixq

    3.8K5231932211.3M viewsView on X
  • Jun 8, 20264.4x their median

    Last week, Argentina’s President Milei announced a new legal category for non-human corporations – companies run by #AI agents or robots. Like traditional corporations, they would be granted legal personhood. This could generate enormous new wealth, but very worryingly, it would also hand AIs an all-purpose key that grants access to our financial, economic and political systems. Full op-ed in today's @FT: https://t.co/w6DzOwByiq

    1.6K623209149800K viewsView on X
  • Jun 2, 20261.9x their median

    MAI-Image-2.5 has officially released from @MicrosoftAI landing at #2 in the Image Edit Arena (Single-Image-Edit) with a score of 1401 and advances the Pareto frontier! This puts the model +10 pts over Nano Banana 2, Grok Imagine Image Quality and ChatGPT-Image-Latest-High Fidelity. Congrats to the @MicrosoftAI team on this big accomplishment!

    982934031150K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 2026

    Microsoft's MAI-Image-2.5-Pro debuts at #1 on the Artificial Analysis Image Editing Leaderboard, and takes the #7 spot in Text to Image MAI-Image-2.5-Pro is Microsoft AI's quality-focused image model, launched July 23 in preview on Microsoft Foundry. It joins MAI-Image-2.5 and MAI-Image-2.5-Flash in a family Microsoft positions as covering the quality-speed-cost curve, so builders can pick the point that fits their job. Pro sits at the quality end: Microsoft describes it as its highest-fidelity image model to date, aimed at hero imagery, detailed editing, and precise in-image text rendering. In the Artificial Analysis Image Arena, MAI-Image-2.5-Pro debuts at #1 on the Image Editing Leaderboard, surpassing Reve 2.1, GPT Image 2, and Microsoft's own MAI-Image-2.5. In Text to Image it lands at #7. On Microsoft Foundry, MAI-Image-2.5-Pro is priced per token: $5 per 1M text input tokens, $8 per 1M image input tokens, and $106 per 1M image output tokens, which works out to roughly $108.5 per 1k 1024x1024 images. That compares to $48 per 1k images for MAI-Image-2.5 and $20 per 1k for MAI-Image-2.5-Flash. MAI-Image-2.5-Pro is available in preview on Microsoft Foundry across seven global-standard regions, and can be tried out in the MAI Playground. Congratulations to @MicrosoftAI on the release! See below for comparisons between MAI-Image-2.5-Pro and other leading models in the Artificial Analysis Image Arena 🧵

    699592724167K viewsView on X
  • Jul 9, 2026

    Introducing Ode Poetry. Ode is a wonderful poetry pharmacy that reads you a poem for the moment you’re in. Just tell Ode what you're feeling, and it uses Microsoft AI audio models to connect you with the same work that poetry expert William Sieghart would recommend. The best technology doesn't replace human creativity, it helps more people experience it. Super proud of the team for making this truly humanist tool. More in the blog: https://t.co/oCDTiIdXxW

    44341166120531K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 2026

    Microsoft's MAI-Image-2.6-Preview lands at #1 on the Artificial Analysis Image Editing Leaderboard and takes #2 in Text to Image MAI-Image-2.6 is the newest model in Microsoft AI's MAI-Image family, announced August 10. Microsoft highlights stronger text rendering, better portraits and 3D imagery, and more polished commercial and photorealistic outputs. Like the MAI-Image-2.5 family, it handles both text to image generation and image editing. In the Artificial Analysis Image Arena, MAI-Image-2.6-Preview debuts at #1 on the Image Editing Leaderboard, ahead of Microsoft's own MAI-Image-2.5-Pro, Reve 2.1, and OpenAI's GPT Image 2, and giving Microsoft the top two spots on the board. In Text to Image it takes #2, behind only OpenAI's GPT Image 2 and ahead of Reve 2.1. On our refreshed Text to Image taxonomy, MAI-Image-2.6-Preview takes the top spot on 5 of the 19 category leaderboards (Material, Knowledge, Frontier, Retail & Ecommerce, and Marketing & Advertising), ahead of GPT Image 2, which leads every other category. MAI-Image-2.6 extends a rapid run of strong image releases from Microsoft AI. MAI-Image-2.5 debuted at #2 in Text to Image in June. MAI-Image-2.5-Pro, launched July 23, took #1 in Image Editing when we published our results last week. MAI-Image-2.6 now takes that top spot from its own sibling, and sits at #2 in Text to Image against MAI-Image-2.5-Pro's #8. MAI-Image-2.6 is available in the MAI Playground and in Private Preview on Microsoft Foundry. Congratulations to @MicrosoftAI on the release! See below for our analysis of MAI-Image-2.6-Preview and other leading models in the Artificial Analysis Image Arena 🧵

    575512713112K viewsView on X
  • Jun 2, 2026

    Today’s news all comes down to this: we’re putting our relentless hill-climbing machine at your service. From launching top tier models to helping you make them your own, our commitment as a platform company is to keep you at the absolute frontier. For all the details: https://t.co/v65eop5Ixq

    4836228824K viewsView on X
  • Jun 2, 2026

    Humanist superintelligence. The kind of AI worth building. https://t.co/jaUGlG0I4S #MSBuild https://t.co/6WHEQ4nC6y

    47665181453K viewsView on X
  • Jun 3, 2026

    It’s time to move from renting intelligence to truly controlling your AI. Microsoft Frontier Tuning lets you take our models and make them uniquely your own, turning them from capable generalists to completely custom partners. It starts with reinforcement learning environments (RLEs) that allow our models to learn directly from your workflows. Think of them as training gyms for AI. Here the agent learns your very specific processes, your standards, your way of working. It goes from off-the-shelf to hyper-adapted to exactly what you and your teams need. Those adaptations drive efficiency and performance, and your unique models can keep continually learning in your RLEs. This changes the nature of AI – and it changes the impact. For example, within Microsoft we use our RLEs combined with our MAI models to climb towards the best agentic use cases for Excel. Our MAI tuned model is on par with GPT-5.4 on public and private benchmarks, while being up to 10X more efficient. Only you control your agents made with Frontier Tuning. You keep the benefits of your hard-earned know-how, data and institutional knowledge. With us, the RLEs and the models you build in them become your moat. This is distinct. It’s a new era. An era of AI that you control, on your terms. I think it’ll be a good one. More on the blog: https://t.co/v65eop5aHS

    4365239526K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 598 interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.057%. Posts are seen about 78K times each, and 0.768% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.39% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.37 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 4 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video and 25% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.2K interactions, about 14x its own typical post. Only 4 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Mustafa Suleyman's engagement rate on X?
Mustafa Suleyman (@mustafasuleyman) has an engagement rate of 0.057%, based on the median interactions across 4 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,053,847 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.057%, Mustafa Suleyman sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @mustafasuleyman have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @mustafasuleyman post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going