Back to @naomibrockwell's profile

Naomi Brockwell priv/acc engagement report

@naomibrockwell - 94K followers on X

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 25, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.602%
of 94K followers
Per impression
3.62%
16K views on a typical post
Reach
16.6%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
566
interactions (median)
Saved
0.147%
23 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.6/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 566 interactions against 94K followers, an engagement rate of 0.602%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 82% of 3,899 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 3.62% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 16.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 36% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.4K interactions, about 4.3x its own typical post.

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 25, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Naomi Brockwell priv/acc's engagement rate beats 82% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,899 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 5 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 82% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.602%, Naomi Brockwell priv/acc sits above the 75th percentile of the 37,856 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.439% to 2.10%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99155.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,856 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 97,248 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile155.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%53K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%52K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%63K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%75K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%90K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-3%101K
15:00 UTC-2%105K
16:00 UTC-4%102K
17:00 UTC-3%95K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%69K
22:00 UTC-2%60K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%238K
Monday0%302K
Tuesday-3%302K
Wednesday-1%257K
Thursday-2%250K
Friday-3%259K
Saturday+3%233K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 13, 20264.3x their median

    Government surveillance centers are monitoring anti-Flock Instagram accounts and handing over data to local law enforcement. https://t.co/6H03UCtWlQ

    1.6K4651741801.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20263.1x their median

    At @defcon I met so many people building resistance tech: tools to detect Flock cameras, IMSI catchers, Bluetooth trackers, and other surveillance that's been embedded in our lives. People are fighting back 💪 https://t.co/8UBtfW0puC

    1.4K306211133K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20261.9x their median

    The questions isn't whether Flock/Axon/ALPRs stop crime. The question is "at what cost". Warrantless mass surveillance is too high a price for society to pay.

    8291645799.8K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20261.6x their median

    At @Defcon I met with hackers who are building tools to fight the surveillance state. https://t.co/0sE11aRsxN

    77713811125K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20261.5x their median

    Sensing He’s in Deep Trouble, Flock Safety CEO Says It’s All Been a Big Misunderstanding ----- "Consequently, Flock CEO Garrett Langley is now in full damage control mode. The narrative he’s pushing: that it’s all a big misunderstanding. In a new interview, he told Bloomberg that “we’re not Big Brother” — definitely not a thing that Big Brother would say, right? — and that “we’re focused on protecting people.” The company is still trying to paint itself as the good guy, promising to help law enforcement to fight crime, while underplaying egregious instances its tech being misused." https://t.co/sZ7bWmzGPr

    5921581002627K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 2026

    https://t.co/UOZiBJfd0O

    549892157.1K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 2026

    https://t.co/pcSOcijBJq

    50312025127.7K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 2026

    https://t.co/Javuj4gfYb

    368752645.4K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 2026

    Big win for privacy that the federal courts have agreed with me about the urgent need to spotlight the many ways the government is spying on Americans. Now Congress must go further and pass my Government Surveillance Transparency Act. https://t.co/IBzIvu6BcW

    1695924821K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 2026

    When you plug your device into unknown cables or charging stations, you might be leaking more information than you realize. If you just want to charge a device, using a data blocker by default is a simple step that can provide big privacy and security benefits. https://t.co/00m0BAtilM

    189341144.1K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 566 interactions against 94K followers, an engagement rate of 0.602%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 82% of 3,899 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 3.62% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 16.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 36% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.4K interactions, about 4.3x its own typical post.

What is Naomi Brockwell priv/acc's engagement rate on X?
Naomi Brockwell priv/acc (@naomibrockwell) has an engagement rate of 0.602%, based on the median interactions across 14 original posts from the last 30 days against 94,296 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.602%, Naomi Brockwell priv/acc sits above the 75th percentile of the 37,856 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @naomibrockwell have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 82% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,899 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @naomibrockwell post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.6 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going