NowThis Impact engagement report
@nowthisimpact - 2.4M followers on X
Measured over 601 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 30, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 31 interactions against 2.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 601 original posts, its engagement rate beats 13% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 8.6K times each, and 0.36% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.365% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 23.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 601 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 13% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.3K interactions, about 75x its own typical post.
Measured over 601 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 30, 2026. Recurring tag: #polymarketpartner.
Compared with accounts its own size
NowThis Impact's engagement rate beats 13% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 24% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.001%, NowThis Impact sits below the 10th percentile of the 218,393 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.149% |
| 75th percentile | 0.705% |
| 90th percentile | 2.63% |
| 99th percentile | 82.5% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 22:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 1% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 1% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 118 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 27, 202675x their median
No notes https://t.co/HJywbp85IQ
- Oct 8, 202673x their median
https://t.co/6JGhNU1fWV
- Oct 28, 202655x their median
Why are women blamed for everything? https://t.co/rztyn9fw13
- Aug 22, 202642x their median
The MAGA crowd is boo-ing the guy AGAINST p*dos... what does that say? https://t.co/QgX68gtpJz
- Sep 25, 202642x their median
This question backfired — beautifully. https://t.co/gYATgqGqGs
- Oct 29, 202640x their median
Two Republicans in Carroll County, KY, shut down noise limits on data centers, but were furious when residents made them listen to the sounds themselves. https://t.co/5FgDVDS8sH
- Oct 29, 202640x their median
Abdul El-Sayed's response says everything. https://t.co/Y3FwcFoLX8
- Sep 20, 202634x their median
That was almost too easy. https://t.co/yzHGlKjTFh
- Aug 26, 202632x their median
The Trump administration is rounding up federally protected wild horses and selling them for as little as $25 through a legal loophole that strips away their protections and can send them into the slaughter pipeline. Project 2025 explicitly called for giving the government authority to “dispose” of wild horses this way. And as of May 2026, more than 58,000 wild horses remain in federal holding. In 2025, the Bureau of Land Management more than doubled the number of wild horses it sold, to roughly 3,700. Some of those horses later turned up at auctions frequented by slaughter buyers.
- Oct 28, 202632x their median
El-Sayed cooked here. https://t.co/LgzVCl5T0z
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 31 interactions against 2.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 601 original posts, its engagement rate beats 13% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 8.6K times each, and 0.36% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.365% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 23.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 601 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 13% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.3K interactions, about 75x its own typical post.
- What is NowThis Impact's engagement rate on X?
- NowThis Impact (@nowthisimpact) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 601 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,356,888 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.001%, NowThis Impact sits below the 10th percentile of the 218,393 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @nowthisimpact have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 13% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @nowthisimpact post?
- Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 23.13 posts per day across the measured window.