Back to @nytopinion's profile

New York Times Opinion engagement report

@nytopinion - 753K followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.005%
of 753K followers
Per impression
0.474%
8.3K views on a typical post
Reach
1.11%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
40
interactions (median)
Saved
0.066%
6 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.27/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 40 interactions against 753K followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 25% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.3K times each, and 0.474% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.11% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.27 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.0K interactions, about 51x its own typical post.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

New York Times Opinion's engagement rate beats 25% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 33% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.005%, New York Times Opinion sits above the 10th percentile of the 37,459 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.438%
p902.10%
p99159.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,459 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,523 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.438%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile159.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%52K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%62K
09:00 UTC-3%71K
10:00 UTC-2%74K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%89K
13:00 UTC-2%97K
14:00 UTC-3%100K
15:00 UTC-2%104K
16:00 UTC-4%101K
17:00 UTC-3%94K
18:00 UTC-1%87K
19:00 UTC-2%82K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%68K
22:00 UTC-1%59K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%236K
Monday0%298K
Tuesday-3%295K
Wednesday-1%255K
Thursday-1%249K
Friday-3%257K
Saturday+3%231K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 24, 202651x their median

    “No matter what you think about Harry and Meghan, race is the proverbial elephant in the room.” Roxane Gay writes. https://t.co/BuYrg0H3ya

    1.1K20765337124K viewsView on X
  • May 26, 202633x their median

    Breaking News: Sonny Rollins, a jazz great with a forceful and imaginative approach to the tenor saxophone, has died at 95. https://t.co/Q6nXktuJ2L

    8043934489201K viewsView on X
  • Jul 4, 202631x their median

    “Washington was beloved by many for giving away power he could have kept. Trump is reviled by many for snatching power he isn’t entitled to,” writes our columnist Maureen Dowd. “One famously wouldn’t tell a lie. The other famously can’t stop telling lies.” https://t.co/9dIN6gQnEY

    822368481138K viewsView on X
  • Jun 17, 202620x their median

    A.I. companies are engaging in “doom trolling,” Cal Newport writes. “They like to solemnly describe the harms that their models will cause, while acting helpless to do anything about it.” https://t.co/BaQagAQnaT

    6701201014164K viewsView on X
  • May 30, 202615x their median

    “One of the great but incomplete moral revolutions of our lifetime has been the expansion of our compassion to encompass farm animals in a limited way, even as corporate agriculture pushes in the other direction,” our columnist Nicholas Kristof writes. https://t.co/JptuTpsr07

    413150331027K viewsView on X
  • Jan 27, 202513x their median

    New York Times Opinion amplifies voices on the issues that matter to you. Follow us on Bluesky for our latest. Read. Listen. Watch. ⬇️ https://t.co/elvnL198zL

    1241622305218K viewsView on X
  • Jul 10, 202611x their median

    “I never stopped believing in America, but America’s immigration system never believed there should be a place for someone like me,” writes Patricia Rojas, who left the U.S. for Mexico, despite having lived lawfully in Texas since infancy. https://t.co/P7I1r7kmH7

    1863118224199K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20265.6x their median

    In the 18th century the East India Company was the most powerful and dangerous corporation the world had ever seen — that is, until the A.I. giants turned up, William Dalrymple writes. https://t.co/WtYVbPLjjp

    154624516K viewsView on X
  • Jul 7, 20263.1x their median

    Graham Platner's campaign "has become a shameful catastrophe," our columnist Michelle Goldberg writes. "What’s left — besides finding a Democrat to run in his place — is figuring out what, if anything, can be learned from this debacle." https://t.co/LEFs9G1YdC

    401264797K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 20261.6x their median

    “People who feel burned by the medical system are not eager to listen to it now” about antidepressant dependence, Camille Bromley writes. “Instead they often put their trust in online support groups.” https://t.co/zuaUvcLBRq

    38194213K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 40 interactions against 753K followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 25% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.3K times each, and 0.474% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.11% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.27 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.0K interactions, about 51x its own typical post.

What is New York Times Opinion's engagement rate on X?
New York Times Opinion (@nytopinion) has an engagement rate of 0.005%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 753,344 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.005%, New York Times Opinion sits above the 10th percentile of the 37,459 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @nytopinion have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 25% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @nytopinion post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going