Back to @overton_news's profile

Overton engagement report

@overton_news - 272K followers on X

Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.138%
of 272K followers
Per impression
1.37%
27K views on a typical post
Reach
10.1%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
374
interactions (median)
Saved
0.04%
11 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.2/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 374 interactions against 272K followers, an engagement rate of 0.138%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 65% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 27K times each, and 1.37% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 23K interactions, about 63x its own typical post.

Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Overton's engagement rate beats 65% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 51% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.138%, Overton sits above the 25th percentile of the 218,393 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.149%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.149%
p750.705%
p902.63%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 218,393 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 21,698 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.149%
75th percentile0.705%
90th percentile2.63%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 609 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 20, 202663x their median

    Social justice journalist Lisa Durden MELTS DOWN on air after getting absolutely wrecked about the riots in France by conservative commentator Ben Ferguson. Durden claimed the riots were just “student protests,” but Ferguson wasn’t about to let that slide, and he had the receipts to back it up. Then he delivered a brutal reality check that sent Durden into a fit of RAGE. FERGUSON: “You either have to be incredibly incompetent or totally blind to look at the images and think that this is students that are doing this.” Durden immediately snapped. DURDEN: “What you’re not going to do is call me a pathological liar!” “I’m talking now! You’re not going to call me a pathological liar because you don’t know me, so stop that right now!” “EXCUSE YOU!” Katie Pavlich did her best to keep the show from going completely off the rails.

    17K4.2K1.8K2341.1M viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 202627x their median

    Bill Maher just weighed in on the Macklemore saga and dropped a heavy dose of common sense on the whole thing. Maher put it perfectly: MAHER: “Is anyone looking for anything of this at a concert? I mean, do I really need a lecture on politics of any stripe, right when the molly is kicking in?” This is one of those 80/20 issues. People are sick of going to a concert to hear their favorite music and instead getting preached to about politics by entertainers who have no more expertise on the subject than the people sitting in the crowd. He didn’t stop with Macklemore...Maher also took a few shots at Bruce Springsteen for doing the exact same thing. MAHER: “I don’t want Bruce Springsteen to do it either. Why is he doing this? What’s the point? Because the people who agree with him, agree with him, but there’s a lot of people, I bet, who are Trump voters who like Bruce Springsteen and always have.” “He looks like one of them, he’s a working class guy. Now they have to go to the concert like, okay, I still like the music, but, you know, really? I don’t love you as much, Mr. Boss.” Bang on take from Bill.

    8.9K87118433412K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 202618x their median

    Scott Jennings does it again. The CNN panel went into a tailspin, scrambling to justify banning President Trump from social media the moment Jennings compared it to Trump restricting the press from the White House. It was immediate mental gymnastics. He nailed the root of their hypocrisy with a single question. JENNINGS: “If you’re mad about reporters being restricted from going to the White House to report, why would you simultaneously have been someone that would have called for Donald Trump to have had his [speech restricted]? That’s when the panel exploded.

    5.8K83310122294K viewsView on X
  • Oct 22, 202617x their median

    That was a haymaker. After Abdul El-Sayed claimed that Mike Rogers is “bought off” by weapons manufacturers and AIPAC, Rogers dropped the gloves and peeled back the curtain on his radical ties. He called out the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, and Hezbollah by name before dropping a legendary line: ROGERS: “If you are going to go to the United States Senate, we need to know, are you for America or are you for these terrorist groups overseas?” El-Sayed grinned back at him. Rogers wasn’t finished. “Well, you can grin and you can smile and you talk real pretty, but I’m going to tell you what — that is a RISK to our national security.” Brutal.

    5.1K1.1K4014117K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 202615x their median

    Caroline Sunshine exposed a blatant double standard on CNN. The panel demanded that she answer for Ken Paxton's past. But when Sunshine brought up James Talarico's claim that white men are America's biggest domestic terrorist threat, suddenly past comments no longer mattered. SUNSHINE: "Do you think it's okay that he said that white men are the biggest domestic terrorist threat to this country?" ADAM MOCKLER: "Was this some comment from like 2019 that was kind of cringe?" SUNSHINE: "So people aren't held accountable for their past comments?" ADAM MOCKLER: "Of course I don't agree with that. But James Talarico isn't running on that." There it is. Paxton's history must define him, but Talarico's history is dismissed the moment it becomes inconvenient.

    4.8K829318146K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 202614x their median

    The look on Bill Maher’s face was priceless. He literally couldn’t tell if Jessica Tarlov was joking or not. Maher did a double take after Tarlov claimed, with a straight face, that Democrats are “less crazy.” He initially laughed because he thought she was being sarcastic. Then he realized she was actually serious... MAHER: “But I think these recent elections about the Democrats are crazy on social issues, people don’t like that, Trump’s crazy but economy is better. But he doesn’t have the economy anymore.” “I mean...” TARLOV: “And we’re less crazy.” [Silence] MAHER: “Who’s less crazy?” TARLOV: “Democrats!” MAHER: “WHAT??!” TARLOV: “You haven’t noticed?” MAHER: “Have you seen the Democratic…” Maher stopped mid-sentence and began laughing, thinking that Tarlov was cracking a joke. [Audience cracks up] MAHER: “You’re being sarcastic? Oh, I see.” TARLOV: “No…” MAHER: “NO?!” “You think we’re less crazy?” TARLOV: “Maybe not inside, but at least when we go out and give a speech talking about the economy and corruption…” That’s when Maher hit her with a cold dose of reality. MAHER: “They’re communists who think the Islamists are the good guys…” “Are you kidding?! Less crazy?!” TARLOV: “The candidates?” MAHER: “Some of the candidates. You’re not following the Democratic Socialists of America?” Maher had her dead to rights, and she knew it.

    4.4K80110123227K viewsView on X
  • Oct 18, 202614x their median

    MICHIGAN SENATE VOTE % FORECAST: 🟦 Abdul El-Sayed: 49.7% 🟥 Mike Rogers: 47.4% https://t.co/GXBCg5Ooie

    4.9K15311517152K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 202612x their median

    This was a methodical takedown. CNN’s Abby Phillip tried to paint DOGE as a complete failure and then went after Scott Jennings for defending the effort to cut government waste. Jennings didn’t take the bait. He fired back with three brutal reminders that destroyed her narrative on the spot. PHILLIP: “Many people, including you and others at this table, would argue to me that what DOGE was doing was so important…that they were finding government contracts for $30 million.” “And it was chipping away at our national debt. That wasn’t true.” “But now we’re on a spending spree for the president’s vanity projects?” JENNINGS: “I never said they were chipping away at the national debt.” “I’ve consistently said out here and everywhere else that the national debt will only be solved when both parties get serious about entitlement reform. That’s number one.” “Number two, DOGE did important work, which was shine light on things that were patently ridiculous.” “Number three, the federal government is smaller today than it has been since the 1960s and as a portion of GDP it’s smaller, probably since the turn of the last century.” “The $40 trillion debt is a bipartisan disgrace.” “But Dan is exactly right to connect it to the helipad, which is being paid for by Sikorsky, not by tax dollars, is patently ridiculous.”

    4.0K593424212K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 202612x their median

    The Treasury Secretary is a good man. The crew on Squawk Box took a moment to read a letter Scott Bessent wrote to one of their retiring finance anchors, Rick Santelli. Bessent essentially offered Santelli a job at Treasury if he finds himself bored during retirement. Lol. “If you find yourself missing early mornings, Treasury yields, Fed debates and the occasional spirited argument, we may be able to find a desk at Treasury.” Santelli sat on the sidelines with a huge smile on his face, clearly humbled by the honor of receiving a letter from the Treasury Secretary himself. Then Santelli cracked everyone up when he told the panel Bessent’s letter will go on his wall next to one from Karl Rove that simply said: “You magnificent bastard!” Santelli was great at what he did, and he will be missed.

    4.1K4264516189K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20268.8x their median

    Bill O'Reilly issued a dire warning for Donald Trump. If Democrats win both chambers of Congress, presidency will effectively be over, done, finished. O'REILLY: "If the Democrats win the Senate and the House, it's over for President Trump." "They'll impeach him, they'll sue him, every two minutes will be something else and nothing will ever get passed." "So, there are going to be two years of 'Let's get Trump.'" The Republicans must hold at least one chamber or Trump's entire legacy could be destroyed. These midterms are not just about who controls Congress. They will decide whether Trump spends his final two years governing or fighting for survival. Republicans needs to get their heads in the game and finally realize what time it is.

    2.4K47536937205K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 374 interactions against 272K followers, an engagement rate of 0.138%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 65% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 27K times each, and 1.37% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 23K interactions, about 63x its own typical post.

What is Overton's engagement rate on X?
Overton (@overton_news) has an engagement rate of 0.138%, based on the median interactions across 33 original posts from the last 30 days against 272,233 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.138%, Overton sits above the 25th percentile of the 218,393 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @overton_news have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 65% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @overton_news post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going