Back to @pefabiodemelo's profile

padrefabiodemelo engagement report

@pefabiodemelo - 7.7M followers on X

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.004%
of 7.7M followers
Per impression
0.849%
40K views on a typical post
Reach
0.52%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
337
interactions (median)
Saved
0.058%
23 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.03/day
active 3% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Thursday

Early reading. We have captured 1 original post for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 337 interactions against 7.7M followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 1 original post, its engagement rate beats 28% of tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 40K times each, and 0.849% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.516% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.03 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 152K interactions, about 451x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

padrefabiodemelo's engagement rate beats 28% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count. A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.004%, padrefabiodemelo sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.434%
p902.10%
p99160.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,521 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,166 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.434%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%230K
Monday0%286K
Tuesday-2%276K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%244K
Friday-3%252K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 9, 2019451x their median

    Nunca seremos suficientemente bons nem maus para os que nos imaginam.

    121K26K3.5K1.1KView on X
  • Mar 11, 202513x their median

    O seu anjo da guarda indo buscar medicação no CAPS, depois que você quase matá-lo durante o carnaval. https://t.co/YY1YpjoxHt

    3.8K22913170398K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 202411x their median

    Adeus, amigos! https://t.co/AA3zmcrGnw

    3.2K39114237152K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20249.3x their median

    Sobre o fim desta rede, faço das palavras de Roberta as minhas. https://t.co/owHsJxaZMn

    2.6K5025515128K viewsView on X
  • Mar 27, 20255.7x their median

    Espiritualidade do dia: sobre a necessidade de encerrar os ciclos. https://t.co/vlBW6q9ntz

    1.1K10568368600K viewsView on X
  • Mar 10, 20254.6x their median

    No contexto dos relacionamentos abusivos estão as pessoas que são especialistas em manter cativeiros emocionais. Elas não são presentes o suficiente para que você tenha segurança, mas também não se afastam o suficiente para que delas você se liberte.

    1.3K149561571K viewsView on X
  • Jul 15, 20244.4x their median

    O evangelho do dia: livre-se da visão romântica de que todo “familiar” quer o seu bem. https://t.co/kDL0EMuZUv

    1.3K148291351K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20243.5x their median

    Espiritualidade do dia: sobre a importância de saber a hora de ir embora. https://t.co/hYf3cYUGrZ

    8761171731249K viewsView on X
  • Mar 14, 20253.4x their median

    Espiritualidade do dia: sacrifício e mudança de vida. https://t.co/LgH7aOjgZN

    879831751184K viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 20243.3x their median

    O evangelho do dia: de vez em quando é preciso ser para si, ser em si. https://t.co/FFHsDdkAQ9

    9368280946K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 337 interactions against 7.7M followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 1 original post, its engagement rate beats 28% of tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 40K times each, and 0.849% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.516% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.03 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 152K interactions, about 451x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is padrefabiodemelo's engagement rate on X?
padrefabiodemelo (@pefabiodemelo) has an engagement rate of 0.004%, based on the median interactions across 1 original posts from the last 30 days against 7,685,768 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.004%, padrefabiodemelo sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @pefabiodemelo have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 28% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count, which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @pefabiodemelo post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going