Maria Dubovikova engagement report
@politblogme - 75K followers on X
Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 27, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 45 interactions against 75K followers, an engagement rate of 0.06%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 21,625 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.3K times each, and 0.718% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.39% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video and 19% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 23K interactions, about 501x its own typical post.
Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 27, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Maria Dubovikova's engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,625 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 30% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.06%, Maria Dubovikova sits above the 25th percentile of the 218,281 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.149%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.149% |
| 75th percentile | 0.705% |
| 90th percentile | 2.63% |
| 99th percentile | 82.5% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 56% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 19% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 56% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 19% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 457 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 22, 2026501x their median
Im Plenum des Europäischen Parlaments habe ich über Angelina gesprochen. Sie war ein Jahr alt. Am 19. Oktober wurde sie in einem Park in der Ukraine von einer russischen Drohne getötet. Ihre Mutter Ina starb kurz darauf im Krankenhaus. Das ist die Realität in der Ukraine. Das ist der mörderische Krieg des Kriegsverbrechers Wladimir Putin. Er will die Ukraine vernichten, Ukrainerinnen und Ukrainer töten und die Zivilbevölkerung vertreiben. Und der US-Präsident sieht nicht nur ungerührt zu, er nimmt Putin auch noch in Schutz. Ich habe im Plenum klargemacht: Europa steht an der Seite der Ukraine, humanitär, wirtschaftlich, technologisch und militärisch. Wir halten an den Sanktionen fest, bis Putin das Töten beendet.
- Sep 4, 2026108x their median
LEIPZIG Ist euch diese Manipulation nicht aufgefallen. JETZT meldet sich Krone-Schmalz zu Wort! https://t.co/5XFBBdKVz4
- Apr 8, 202270x their median
“A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth puts on its boots”. — Winston Churchill (as quoted by Ernest Lefever)
- Sep 6, 202661x their median
🇩🇪 German Chancellor Merz on AfD: "We will not let these people, who trash the Federal Republic of Germany and everything we have achieved in recent years and decades, despite all the mistakes that exist, despite all the problems we have. We will not let these people talk our country into ruin." It would be a cute speech if what was "achieved" in the last few decades wasn't the decline of Germany in just about every conceivable way. Writer: Mhedi https://t.co/Y7Y1tVtiK0
- Oct 24, 202660x their median
Сьогодні зранку помер останній в Україні 🇺🇦дивізійник Дмитро Марусяк з Коломийщини. Йому було 101. Вічна шана! https://t.co/Xw1uD1jPzz
- Oct 22, 202659x their median
Every time russia announces they are ready for peace - the massive attack on civilians follows. I counted at least 16 ballistic hits in Kyiv - feels like Armageddon.
- Oct 20, 202654x their median
Five communist organizations helped build the movement that turned to rioting in France on 17 October. All five have documented ties to Moscow. https://t.co/YTxZtioy8t
- Oct 24, 202642x their median
Three pro-Trump influencers on the same day in Belgrade. All have the same script: visit the St. Sava church in Belgrade and post on how Serbia is defending Christian values and criticize Vučić’s oponents one day ahead of national elections. Two are US-based but there are more. https://t.co/lFeG5Gdqru
- Sep 5, 202634x their median
First the CIA director flies in. He makes threats. He’s told, in so many words, to go fuck himself. Next comes a show of escalation — during which the United States sits quietly in the shadows and gives its European marionettes room to throw a fit, those same marionettes who still sincerely believe they are sovereign. After that, the familiar negotiators arrive. The West operates by the models of social psychology — universal only in part, because everything they rest on was researched in the West, on Western subjects — and assumes Russia is not all that different and will react according to the patterns and rules they have identified. With an individual, especially a young one driven into a corner, that might work. With grown people here, with Russian tempering, and still more with a state system made of such people, it does not. Meanwhile, coercive diplomacy is unfolding in plain sight. Good cop, bad cop. The bad cop has already been here. Now two nice guys — the ones the chebureks in Zaryadye have been waiting for — have landed in Moscow. The scheme, the hard-power version of the door-in-the-face technique, looks like this in its pure form: Threat + unacceptable terms → refusal → escalation → negotiators (creating the illusion of an “exit” from a supposedly hopeless situation). Against the backdrop of pressure already applied, the deal is meant, in the manipulators’ design, to look like their concession and our salvation — not like capitulation from a standing start. And each round, run in cycles, makes that “exit” narrower and more inconvenient. The key nuance without which the scheme fails: it is not enough for the one making threats to frighten you. He also has to offer a credible guarantee that, if you agree, the pressure will stop and there will be an “honest peace.” Will the current visit produce any diplomatic movement? Of course not. Talking to Russia from a position of strength is useless. What does a Russian do when the other side starts acting the bull? Either he tries to get rid of the nuisance — or he hits him in the face. Even if the West wanted to talk differently, it no longer has that option. Today’s militarism and hysteria have cut it off: if it starts that game now, its rabid hangers-on will accuse the ruling elites of betrayal, defeatism, and whatever other sins are known only to them. The West’s bet on intimidation only kills any desire to talk at all, to hear anything coming from that direction, let alone to listen. There is little point to what is happening beyond giving Ukraine a few days to regroup during the white gentlemen’s tour, so it can continue state terrorism — “raising the stakes to force peace,” as Kiev’s handlers like to put it.
- Mar 3, 202225x their median
About "non-existent Nazis" in Ukraine. A few years ago, a veteran of the punitive operation from Vinnitsa opened the production of canned meat under the names "Separatist in oil" and "Separatist in sour cream". https://t.co/uRTgiHMqxK
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 45 interactions against 75K followers, an engagement rate of 0.06%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 21,625 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.3K times each, and 0.718% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.39% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video and 19% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 23K interactions, about 501x its own typical post.
- What is Maria Dubovikova's engagement rate on X?
- Maria Dubovikova (@politblogme) has an engagement rate of 0.06%, based on the median interactions across 16 original posts from the last 30 days against 74,723 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.06%, Maria Dubovikova sits above the 25th percentile of the 218,281 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @politblogme have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,625 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @politblogme post?
- Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.9 posts per day across the measured window.