Back to @pppenaloza's profile

Pedro Pablo Peñaloza engagement report

@pppenaloza - 491K followers on X

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.128%
of 491K followers
Per impression
3.72%
17K views on a typical post
Reach
3.44%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
627
interactions (median)
Saved
0.03%
5 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.47/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 627 interactions against 491K followers, an engagement rate of 0.128%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 72% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 3.72% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.44% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.47 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 10% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.2K interactions, about 3.5x its own typical post.

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Pedro Pablo Peñaloza's engagement rate beats 72% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 86% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.128%, Pedro Pablo Peñaloza sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.081% to 0.439%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99158.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,582 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 105,409 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile158.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%52K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%62K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%74K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%89K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-4%101K
15:00 UTC-2%104K
16:00 UTC-3%102K
17:00 UTC-3%94K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%68K
22:00 UTC-2%59K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%237K
Monday0%300K
Tuesday-3%299K
Wednesday-1%256K
Thursday-1%249K
Friday-3%258K
Saturday+3%232K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jul 19, 20263.5x their median

    Informan que debido a daños en sus estructuras, colecciones de la Biblioteca Nacional fueron llevadas a las bóvedas del Banco Central. Allí tienen todo el espacio para ser resguardadas, pues tras 27 años de chavismo esas bóvedas están vacías...

    1.4K717221429K viewsView on X
  • Jul 6, 20263.2x their median

    No pudo con el Guaire y la manda pa' La Guaira. Cambian una letra, pero mantienen las mismas costumbres...

    1.3K611391119K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20262.9x their median

    Nadie puede predecir terremotos. Muy pocos pueden vaticinar el impacto del superniño. Todos saben que se robaron los reales...

    1.3K51612718K viewsView on X
  • Jul 4, 20262.8x their median

    Cosas que pueden decir Messi y Alex Saab: "Cabo Verde es un rival muy duro"...

    1.4K285111023K viewsView on X
  • Jul 26, 20262.4x their median

    Más que una iniciativa, el manifiesto de Panamá fue una reacción. Conscientes de lo que se fraguaba en el Departamento de Estado, MCM y la Plataforma Unitaria lanzaron un último intento para frenar lo inevitable. El gobierno de Estados Unidos tomó nota de la carta y respondió:

    9863807056148K viewsView on X
  • Jul 13, 20262.0x their median

    EEUU tuvo que capturar a Maduro para que el chavismo liberara presos políticos, disminuyera la persecución y ensayara una leve apertura. Venezuela tuvo que sufrir dos terremotos para que el chavismo admitiera que la ley de alquileres es "regresiva". No, tú no eres necio...

    88436414830K viewsView on X
  • Jul 5, 20261.8x their median

    Una semana antes de los terremotos, el Centro de Estudios Políticos de la UCAB reveló un dato que sirve para entender la reacción de la gente frente a la actuación de la FANB. Un encuesta de Delphos medía el nivel de confianza en las instituciones. Los resultados:

    7123912012116K viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 20261.7x their median

    Gobierno alerta que Venezuela enfrenta la amenaza del "Súper Niño". Sin embargo, expertos afirman que ese fenómeno es menos destructivo que el recordado "Súper Bigote"...

    76228516718K viewsView on X
  • Jun 16, 20261.6x their median

    Delcy Rodríguez promete que "finalmente" terminarán la central de Tocoma. Debe recordarse que esas obras se paralizaron no por la ineficiencia. Muchos menos por la corrupción que se comió miles de millones de dólares. Sino porque los planos de Tocoma los hizo Gaudí...

    75221328658K viewsView on X
  • Jun 13, 20261.6x their median

    El Tren de Aragua no existe. El Niño Guerrero está fuera del país. Y la soberanía de Venezuela es inviolable. Verdades como puños...

    674202881731K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 627 interactions against 491K followers, an engagement rate of 0.128%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 72% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 3.72% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.44% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.47 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 10% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.2K interactions, about 3.5x its own typical post.

What is Pedro Pablo Peñaloza's engagement rate on X?
Pedro Pablo Peñaloza (@pppenaloza) has an engagement rate of 0.128%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 490,774 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.128%, Pedro Pablo Peñaloza sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @pppenaloza have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 72% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @pppenaloza post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.47 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going