Back to @pranksy's profile

Pranksy engagement report

@pranksy - 436K followers on X

Measured over 43 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.016%
of 436K followers
Per impression
0.396%
18K views on a typical post
Reach
4.11%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
71
interactions (median)
Saved
0.006%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.47/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 71 interactions against 436K followers, an engagement rate of 0.016%. Measured over 43 original posts, its engagement rate beats 38% of 3,792 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 0.396% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.11% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 43 posts sampled, 74% carry an image or video and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 16K interactions, about 225x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #nufc, #99picecream, #binface.

Measured over 43 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026. Recurring tags: #nufc, #99picecream, #binface.

Compared with accounts its own size

Pranksy's engagement rate beats 38% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,792 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 28% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.016%, Pranksy sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.433%
p902.10%
p99160.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,654 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,977 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.433%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-3%98K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-1%57K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%231K
Monday0%288K
Tuesday-2%278K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%245K
Friday-3%253K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 16, 2026225x their median

    En 2008, Elon Musk estaba a 12 días de la quiebra. De pie en un salón de Hollywood, intentaba vender un auto de $109,000 dólares a gente que pensaba que estaba loco. Su propio Roadster estaba aparcado afuera, como si fuera una simple bicicleta. Empezó hablando de dinero: El Congreso había aprobado 25.000 millones para fabricar autos eficientes. 
Los Big Three volaron a Washington y lo pidieron… para pagar sueldos de sus gasolina-devoradores. El Congreso dijo que sí. 
“Eso les da hasta febrero”, dijo Musk. Tesla pidió del mismo fondo… pero para lo que realmente se había creado: un auto más barato. Y entonces soltó la frase que nadie en la sala registró: Tesla no paga dividendos.
Nunca lo hará. 
Cada dólar de cada Roadster de 109.000 va directo al siguiente auto más barato. Su sueldo: el mínimo legal. No les dijo que la empresa tenía días de caja. 
Ni que si no cerraban una ronda de emergencia antes de Nochebuena… se acababa todo. Habló de celulares. 
De cómo los primeros costaban una fortuna. 
De que no se llega al barato sin vender primero el caro. 100 autos fabricados. 
El número 100 salía el martes. 
Y él mismo entregaría las llaves. Seis meses después, GM se declaró en quiebra. El tipo del sueldo mínimo… no.

    14K1.4K178583.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 2026148x their median

    🚨 BREAKING: Nigel Farage has won the Clacton by-election ➡️ FARAGE: 22,239 (+1,014) - 62.8% 🗑️ BINFACE: 9,455 (NEW) - 26.7% 44.37% turnout Changes w/ 2024

    9.2K4603485491.7M viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 2026136x their median

    le han pitado este penalti al Sevilla, enserio? creo que es el mayor robo que he visto en mi vida. Los del VAR que hacian? https://t.co/Pj4ApveaoL

    8.6K611343118969K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 202627x their median

    "I want my 99 pence ice cream!" I'm voting for Count Binface "Now the Clacton kids by the slot machines keep singing about bins & cheap ice creams." #Binface #Clacton #Farage #99pIceCream https://t.co/PfBwVui7bO

    1.5K3793834513K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 202622x their median

    🚨 WATCH: Nigel Farage says he will not attend the Clacton by-election count after advice from the police "There is an organised campaign to disrupt and degrade the result that will take place in a few hours time" https://t.co/aOG7RNISXm

    1.0K12632992488K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 202615x their median

    🚨 Newcastle United are showing interest in Benfica right-back Amar Dedić as they explore defensive reinforcements ahead of the new season. The 23-year-old is already familiar with Newcastle boss Matthias Jaissle, having previously worked under him at RB Salzburg. (Source: @SamC_reports)

    98649374128K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 202611x their median

    Sounds like I need to make a @RobinhoodCrypto NFT collection?

    5341721521109K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 202610x their median

    🚨 The final 3 celebrities who will be joining the cast of Strictly Come Dancing 2026, according to The Sun, are actress Melanie Walters, Olympian Tabby Stoecker, & football influencer John Nellis. Official announcements are expected to round off the cast next week. #Strictly https://t.co/LgsFmq8aNp

    49219109110926K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202610x their median

    If (IF) I was to release an NFT collection, which blockchain should I (theoretically) mint them on? My heart and brain says Mainnet, but open to conversation

    404928911119K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20269.4x their median

    Old PFP, who this? https://t.co/iLfN0FT602

    502101391455K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#nufc#99picecream#binface#clacton#eredivisie

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 71 interactions against 436K followers, an engagement rate of 0.016%. Measured over 43 original posts, its engagement rate beats 38% of 3,792 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 0.396% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.11% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 43 posts sampled, 74% carry an image or video and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 16K interactions, about 225x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #nufc, #99picecream, #binface.

What is Pranksy's engagement rate on X?
Pranksy (@pranksy) has an engagement rate of 0.016%, based on the median interactions across 43 original posts from the last 30 days against 435,891 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.016%, Pranksy sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @pranksy have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 38% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,792 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @pranksy post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.47 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going