Back to @psych4you's profile

علم النفس لحياتك engagement report

@psych4you - 440K followers on X

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 30, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0%
of 440K followers
Per impression
0.036%
2.8K views on a typical post
Reach
0.63%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1
interactions (median)
Saved
0.018%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.3/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Thursday

Early reading. We have captured 2 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 440K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Posts are seen about 2.8K times each, and 0.036% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.632% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 385 interactions, about 385x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #التحرش_الجنسي, #تحدث_بالعربية_أسلم_لك, #ريتويت. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 30, 2026. Recurring tags: #التحرش_الجنسي, #تحدث_بالعربية_أسلم_لك, #ريتويت.

Where this sits in the catalog

At under 0.001%, علم النفس لحياتك sits below the 10th percentile of the 217,518 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.148%
p750.704%
p902.63%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 217,518 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 21,717 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.148%
75th percentile0.704%
90th percentile2.63%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video50% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link50% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 50% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 50% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 1374 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Feb 15, 2026385x their median

    دليل «مقاضي رمضان » يسهّلك طريق التسوق الواعي: التخطيط قبل الشراء، التصرف الذكي أثناء التسوق، واختيار البدائل الرمضانية الصحية 🛒

    24993934465K viewsView on X
  • Apr 17, 2026331x their median

    Therapists whose idea of psychotherapy is manualized treatment, behavior checklists, and breathing exercises: you will soon be replaced by AI, and you had it coming.

    2565119556K viewsView on X
  • Mar 3, 2026308x their median

    مجلس الوزراء يعتمد سياستين وطنيتين صادرتين عن اللجنة الوزارية للصحة في كل السياسات، في خطوة إستراتيجية تعزز السلوك الغذائي الصحي، وتوفر بيئات تعليمية آمنة، وتدعم التحول من العلاج إلى الوقاية. https://t.co/gBiYAXvOuH

    169962518199K viewsView on X
  • Jun 10, 202649x their median

    ما هي أسباب انتشار الأمراض المناعيّة ..وكيف نتعايش معها برنامج #صباح_الخير_يا_عرب من الأحد- الخميس الساعة 11 صباحاً بتوقيت السعودية على #MBC1 مجاناً على MBC شاهد لمتابعة البث المباشر https://t.co/Li4k5cIzbl https://t.co/zTT63r2yrJ

    3386218K viewsView on X
  • May 11, 202640x their median

    لم أستطع تجاوز هذه المقالة، أنصح بقراءتها بعيداً عن التحيز أو الاختزالية! التسميات ( Nomenclature ) في الاضطرابات النفسية ( اكتئاب ، فرط الحركة وتشتت الانتباه ، قلق ، طيف التوحد ) ..الخ لا تحمل أي دلالة سببية تشخيصية عن سبب الاضطراب لذلك هذه المقالة المميزة للدكتور @awaisaftab يحاول أن يوصل رسالة هامة للممارسين وأيضاً لمستفيدي خدمات الصحة النفسية أن استخدام التسمية التشخيصية هي أداة عملية وصفية لنمط معين من المعاناة والسلوكيات غير التكيفية ولكنه ليس حكماً جوهرياً على الدماغ ولا على الشخصية. حتى الآن دراسات الوراثة وتصوير الدماغ والدوائر العصبية وغيرها تظهر ارتباطاً بيولوجياً، ولكن لا يمكن حتى الآن أن تنتج محكات تشخيصية بالأدلة التشخيصية DSM/ICD فيها صدق وثبات في العتبة التشخيصية، يمكن من خلالها التمييز بشكل موثوق بين شخصين لهما بنية وراثية متشابهة أو يتم تصوير الدماغ ومن خلالها يتم تمييز أن أحدهما مصاب بالاكتئاب والأخر بأي اضطراب نفسي آخر استناداً لتلك الفحوصات. ما الحلول ؟ التشخيص أمر مفيد وضروري ولا يلغي كاتب المقال أهميته وفوائدة ولكن أعتقد أن رسالته هي أن الاضطرابات النفسية ظاهرة حقيقية ولكنها معقدة. خاتمة هذه التغريدة يمكن أن تعامل التشخيص كخريطة عامة، لكن اعمل في السياق العيادي على العمليات النفسية والسمات البعدية المحددة لكل مريض( استفد من النموذج البعدي كيف يرى الاضطراب من مفهوم بعدي Dimensional اطلع على ابحاث RDoC وHiTOP )، اهتم بصياغة الحالة Case formulation تفريد الشخص https://t.co/aey15DqjZ2

    3171114K viewsView on X
  • Mar 25, 202623x their median

    https://t.co/RdJD2ot23F

    116604.4K viewsView on X
  • Mar 2, 2026

    تعميم يلزم باستخدام مصطلح "الأشخاص ذوي الإعاقة" استخدام مصطلح ذوي الهمم، وغيره، غير مسموح به في الخطابات الرسمية أو التصريحات الإعلامية. https://t.co/tkRY8PSmao

    77006.0K viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 202612x their median

    كيف تنبأت الدراسات العلمية بوجود الذكاء الاصطناعي؟ قبل أن يصبح الذكاء الاصطناعي حاضرًا في تفاصيل حياتنا اليومية، سبقت ظهوره تساؤلات علمية وفكرية حول قدرة الآلات على محاكاة بعض أشكال التفكير والتعلم. #بودكاست_ابن_خلدون @IbnKhaldnschool للمشاهدة : https://t.co/c4klnvbuw0 https://t.co/qVLMDlh88y

    640220K viewsView on X
  • Jun 26, 20267.0x their median

    https://t.co/oplD0oaQ1A

    34001.9K viewsView on X
  • Mar 16, 20265.0x their median

    تجاهل كم بلغت من العمر إذا كانت لديك أهداف لتحققها فأنت لازلت شاباً مترجم

    41001.3K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#التحرش_الجنسي#تحدث_بالعربية_أسلم_لك#ريتويت#مذكرات_من_عيادتي

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 440K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Posts are seen about 2.8K times each, and 0.036% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.632% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 385 interactions, about 385x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #التحرش_الجنسي, #تحدث_بالعربية_أسلم_لك, #ريتويت. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is علم النفس لحياتك's engagement rate on X?
علم النفس لحياتك (@psych4you) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 2 original posts from the last 30 days against 440,162 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At under 0.001%, علم النفس لحياتك sits below the 10th percentile of the 217,518 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @psych4you have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @psych4you post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going