Qtum engagement report
@qtum - 270K followers on X
Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 27, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 74 interactions against 270K followers, an engagement rate of 0.028%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 37% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.0K times each, and 1.06% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.61% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.53 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 58% carry an image or video, 8% are part of a thread and 67% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 662 interactions, about 11x its own typical post.
Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 27, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Qtum's engagement rate beats 37% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 44% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.028%, Qtum sits above the 25th percentile of the 218,281 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.149%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.149% |
| 75th percentile | 0.705% |
| 90th percentile | 2.63% |
| 99th percentile | 82.5% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 58% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 67% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 58% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 67% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 238 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jul 20, 202611x their median
💥 Lightning Network is Bitcoin's killer app Ethereum 15 TPS 🤪 PayPal 200 TPS 😭 Visa 24,000 TPS 😬 Solana 65k TPS 😶 Lightning 40,000,000 TPS 🤯 Altcoins and legacy payment can't compete. Higher transaction throughput at lower cost + global access. https://t.co/aaHEhBCxuV
- Mar 18, 20222.9x their median
Zcash on Qtum. Learn about the Phantom Protocol from the white paper: https://t.co/C2g0GMDdUX
- Oct 3, 20261.7x their median
We will begin research on Lightning Network and how it would operate on Qtum. The protocol claims millions to billions of transactions per second. Transactions are very cheap, enabling micro transactions. We believe this could be a useful addition to Qtum, what do you think? https://t.co/MGy3hhKla6
- Oct 9, 2026
Congrats to @LBank_Exchange for 11 years of operation! Thanks for all the help in the past supporting our many software updates and hard fork, we appreciate it. Happy Anniversary! https://t.co/G7R2IBtr2p
- Sep 29, 2026
Qwen 3.8 27b is live at https://t.co/PwQQ2cOq3q $0.08 / 1M Output $0.01 / 1M Input 262k Context, Vision Enabled, 128k Max Output Full 16Bit precision. No signup required, no monthly subscription, no minimum purchase. Pay only for what you use. https://t.co/efucgALy6C
- Sep 30, 2026
We modified a prompt shared by @umesh_ai to give a special ending and ran it through the https://t.co/PwQQ2cOq3q Video Studio. Video rendered with MiniMax H3, prompt in the comments below! https://t.co/QJqoe8TgA1
- Aug 28, 2026
WAN 3.0-Video from @Alibaba_Wan is now available on the Qtum AI Router and Qtum Video Studio. No signup required. Up to 30 second videos. 480p, 720p, 1080p Costs far less than Seedance 2.5 The 30s 720p video below cost 2.4 Qtum: https://t.co/cTRWZSGGG2
- Aug 27, 2026
Test transfer of 25 $USDC from Sepolia to Qtum Testnet took about 1 minute on the Qtum Bridge. Not too bad! https://t.co/WXDUoCa9Re
- Sep 15, 2026
We added Qwen 3.8 27b to the Qtum AI Router $0.30 / 1m tokens in | $1.18 / 1m tokens out 262k Context, vision enabled. 55 token/s. FP16 quant. This model sees about 260 billion tokens / week on OpenRouter served for $2.00 per 1m tokens out. https://t.co/uYPCb4uKSP
- Oct 5, 2026
Great to see such a healthy network weight: 20,597,829 This is what keeps the network healthy and resistant to 51% attacks. It also helps keep the average block time parked at 32 seconds, right where it should be.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 74 interactions against 270K followers, an engagement rate of 0.028%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 37% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.0K times each, and 1.06% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.61% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.53 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 58% carry an image or video, 8% are part of a thread and 67% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 662 interactions, about 11x its own typical post.
- What is Qtum's engagement rate on X?
- Qtum (@qtum) has an engagement rate of 0.028%, based on the median interactions across 12 original posts from the last 30 days against 270,244 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.028%, Qtum sits above the 25th percentile of the 218,281 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @qtum have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 37% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @qtum post?
- Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.53 posts per day across the measured window.