Back to @realnamediamond's profile

Ms. TOOGOOD2BTrue engagement report

@realnamediamond - 92K followers on X

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
2.41%
of 92K followers
Per impression
1.70%
130K views on a typical post
Reach
141.9%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.2K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.068%
88 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.53/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 2.2K interactions against 92K followers, an engagement rate of 2.41%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 96% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 130K times each, and 1.70% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 141.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 44% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 38K interactions, about 17x its own typical post.

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Ms. TOOGOOD2BTrue's engagement rate beats 96% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 5 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 60% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 2.41%, Ms. TOOGOOD2BTrue sits above the 90th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 10% band, which runs 2.10% to 158.1%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99158.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,582 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 105,409 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile158.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%52K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%62K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%74K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%89K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-4%101K
15:00 UTC-2%104K
16:00 UTC-3%102K
17:00 UTC-3%94K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%68K
22:00 UTC-2%59K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%237K
Monday0%300K
Tuesday-3%299K
Wednesday-1%256K
Thursday-1%249K
Friday-3%258K
Saturday+3%232K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 22, 202617x their median

    The Zendaya meme getting ready to clock in for another long day of being put to work https://t.co/NZGJsNGrYG

    34K3.4K861411.7M viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20268.9x their median

    This single mom of 3 called her mom to vent about her man asking for too much, her mama definitely lives in reality and her daughter lives in social media land lol https://t.co/8t67DM1NWp

    16K2.2K9015062.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20264.3x their median

    Me ignoring the all men cheat tweets because I’ll kill this nigga https://t.co/qxAzGJbigG

    7.4K1.8K69189143K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20262.7x their median

    Got a boner while talking to my co worker and she noticed it https://t.co/gv6hlNKfWu

    5.7K13324733.4M viewsView on X
  • Apr 21, 2023

    If multiple people are saying the same thing about you what does that mean?

    1.4K3301146563.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 2026

    the dumbest sht you can do is give your kid a last name you don’t have.. 😒 no shade to me tho !

    1.6K33355227130K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 2026

    I’m so tired of these Ai accounts with dumb ass scenarios .

    142017.2K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 2026

    The fact that Walmart is about to accept tap pay should be a lillllll alarming to us .

    10102.7K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 2026

    Apple cider in your wata you a dirty bitch????? WHO TAUGHT U THAT???

    10002.3K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 2026

    I’m not adding shit to the front of “woman” to identify me … ARE YOU STUPID???????

    10002.0K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.2K interactions against 92K followers, an engagement rate of 2.41%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 96% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 130K times each, and 1.70% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 141.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 44% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 38K interactions, about 17x its own typical post.

What is Ms. TOOGOOD2BTrue's engagement rate on X?
Ms. TOOGOOD2BTrue (@realnamediamond) has an engagement rate of 2.41%, based on the median interactions across 9 original posts from the last 30 days against 91,958 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 2.41%, Ms. TOOGOOD2BTrue sits above the 90th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @realnamediamond have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 96% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @realnamediamond post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.53 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going