Back to @richimedhurst's profile

Richard Medhurst engagement report

@richimedhurst - 551K followers on X

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.039%
of 551K followers
Per impression
0.968%
22K views on a typical post
Reach
3.99%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
213
interactions (median)
Saved
0.073%
16 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.4/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
22:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 213 interactions against 551K followers, an engagement rate of 0.039%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 54% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 22K times each, and 0.968% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.99% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 40% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 664 interactions, about 3.1x its own typical post.

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Richard Medhurst's engagement rate beats 54% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 51% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.039%, Richard Medhurst sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.081%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99158.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,582 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 105,409 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile158.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 22:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%52K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%62K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%74K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%89K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-4%101K
15:00 UTC-2%104K
16:00 UTC-3%102K
17:00 UTC-3%94K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%68K
22:00 UTC-2%59K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%237K
Monday0%300K
Tuesday-3%299K
Wednesday-1%256K
Thursday-1%249K
Friday-3%258K
Saturday+3%232K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 23, 20263.1x their median

    I've been telling you since March/April that a US blockade was coming, that it would hold, and that the US would dominate the oil and gas market. I was proven correct on all points. An analyst who only tells you what you want to hear over and over is feeding you garbage.

    397422071875K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20262.6x their median

    I promise you, no government on this planet views the world in terms of "good" and "evil". The only thing they care about is their own self-interest. That is the only worldview they have. Internalize this and resist the primal urge to root for one team or the other.

    3455112723103K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20261.9x their median

    Notice how Trump doesn't send a fleet to North Korea but goes in person. How can we explain or rationalize this? Does it perhaps have something to do with the fact NK have a strategic deterrent?

    3174050720K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20261.8x their median

    Iran tried the strategy of "nuclear hedging" and suffice to say it didn't work. If you want actual deterrence, you need an actual deterrent. No shortcuts.

    3052751529K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 2026

    Israeli officials are coordinating directly with Syrian and Lebanese officials. When I look at these facts, I see evidence of US influence increasing in the region — not declining. Anyone who tells you otherwise is dealing in wishful thinking and out of touch with reality.

    2172567722K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 2026

    When people critique imperialism, what they are really critiquing are the mechanics of power. The problem is that no great power can behave differently. They all have to play by the same rules. There are no “good” powers—only amoral actors operating in a jungle. No unicorns.

    147181162025K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 2026

    People think some American politicians are "hawkish" — they should read Ancient Greece. It's funny how blunt people were back then, because they hadn't quite ironed out the kinks of decorum. As I keep saying: the US aren't doing anything that hasn't already been done before.

    14312851222K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 2026

    We happen by chance to be alive during the apogee of the US/Anglo-American bloc. But 2500-3000 years ago the Persians, Neo-Assyrians, Athenians, etc. would look & behave no different. To me, this presents two things: an indictment of human nature and a presentism bias.

    12810641120K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 2026

    Real commerce happens by sea, not by land. It's infinitely cheaper to send cargo by ship — and this will not change any time soon. Land routes are not a viable method to bypassing a US naval blockade. Whoever rules the waves, controls global trade.

    137759719K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 2026

    What's actually exceptional/unique about the United States is their geography and their status as a hyperpower. Both are unrivaled throughout history. But in terms of great-power competition, America plays the game like everyone before it — from Athens and Rome to Britain.

    1299451244K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 213 interactions against 551K followers, an engagement rate of 0.039%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 54% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 22K times each, and 0.968% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.99% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 40% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 664 interactions, about 3.1x its own typical post.

What is Richard Medhurst's engagement rate on X?
Richard Medhurst (@richimedhurst) has an engagement rate of 0.039%, based on the median interactions across 15 original posts from the last 30 days against 551,376 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.039%, Richard Medhurst sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @richimedhurst have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 54% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @richimedhurst post?
Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going