Back to @rjraunac's profile

RJ Raunac engagement report

@rjraunac - 971K followers on X

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.563%
of 971K followers
Per impression
3.54%
154K views on a typical post
Reach
15.9%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
5.5K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.179%
276 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.03/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
04:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 5.5K interactions against 971K followers, an engagement rate of 0.563%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 94% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 154K times each, and 3.54% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 15.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 64K interactions, about 12x its own typical post.

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

RJ Raunac's engagement rate beats 94% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 84% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.563%, RJ Raunac sits above the 75th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.433% to 2.10%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.433%
p902.10%
p99160.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,654 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,977 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.433%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 04:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-3%98K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-1%57K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%231K
Monday0%288K
Tuesday-2%278K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%245K
Friday-3%253K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Mar 27, 202012x their median

    आदरणीय प्रधानमंत्री जी ने आज रेडियो के साथियों से बात की,कैसे सब मिलकर #Corona से लड़ सकते हैं @RedFMIndia परिवार का हिस्सा होने के नाते मौक़ा मुझे भी मिला ! और इससे अच्छा क्या होगा जब स्वयं मोदी जी ने कह दिया “बऊआ जी बताइए”😂 मैंने भी कहा नमस्ते बऊआ बोल रहा हूँ @narendramodi 🙏🏻 https://t.co/L0PL5qON9J

    56K6.4K1.2K197View on X
  • Jul 22, 20267.7x their median

    Proud of this kid. He seems amazing. Humbly, It feels like your channel is exploiting him to invalidate other kids. Maybe the next time a bridge collapses you could interview someone who took a longer route to work and got promoted. Instead of engineers or people under it.

    33K4.9K7451431.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20227.1x their median

    1) Here is the thread on Umar Khalid, supporter & sympathizer of terrorist Afzal Guru & terrorist Burhan Wani. Kashmir is occupied by India ~ Umar Khalid. https://t.co/iXM7FVqqip

    25K12K539876View on X
  • Jul 31, 20266.6x their median

    हामिद अंसारी फ़ारूक़ अब्दुल्ला और अब ‘अविमुक्तेश्वरुद्दीन’ (ये शब्द अविमुक्तेश्वरानंद जी ने ही इस्तेमाल किया) -बीच PODCAST light काटी -Camera बंद करने की कोशिश -टीम के mobile छीने - सहयोगियों ने गालियां दी,धमकाया (सब कैमरा में रिकॉर्ड ) -महाराज जी ने स्वयं मुझे उग्र करने की धमकी दी -बाहर निकल कर सहयोगियों ने हाथ मरोड़ा और देख लेने की धमकी दी। लेकिन सारे सवाल TAP किए। TAP का पहला PODCAST है। Premiere कल Saturday 7 PM करूँगा। धन्यवाद 🙏 Susbscribe TAP on YT ये छोटी सा हिस्सा।

    24K9.4K2.6K5961.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 20265.1x their median

    Christians have been in India since St. Thomas the Apostle traveled to the Malabar Coast just decades after the resurrection of our Lord Jesus Christ.   But despite this long Christian history, India’s Parliament is considering amending Foreign Contribution Regulation Amendment (FCRA) rules to permit government takeovers of churches and religious charities.   This is a clear attack against Christians. If this bill proceeds in this way, it would be a point of major concern in our bilateral relationship with India.

    9.7K1.8K13K3.2K7.2M viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 20264.3x their median

    https://t.co/xtN8AxeflH

    19K4.3K197147528K viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 20263.5x their median

    SETBACK TO CJP AND ITS ECOSYSTEM F.I.R.s WILL HAVE TO BE FILED. SUPREME COURT: Probe is required to ascertain attacks on 250 policemen, whether it was by students or some miscreants.

    15K3.8K271125256K viewsView on X
  • Jul 27, 20262.5x their median

    She looked into the camera and declared, "I am a Dalit. I was not allowed to enter the temple because of my caste." But the CCTV footage indeed shows that she and 40–50 others had already spent nearly three hours inside the temple. This is how manufactured victimhood works, make an explosive allegation, invoke caste, trigger outrage, let the narrative spread, and by the time evidence surfaces, the damage is already done. This is exactly how powerful victimhood narratives can take shape where allegations of caste discrimination spread rapidly, while contradictory evidence receives far less attention. If no one asked her caste, no one stopped her from entering, and she was already inside the temple, then such claims don't expose oppression, they manufacture it.

    9.6K3.7K10258258K viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 20261.9x their median

    Stop spreading fake news @sudhirchaudhary ji , “ badi mashoor abhinetri” ? Pls check ur facts . https://t.co/KLw2X0rOPG

    8.0K1.7K445501.1M viewsView on X
  • Jul 27, 20261.9x their median

    The face that launched a thousand bogus op-eds. https://t.co/mnW87mEnN9

    8.4K1.1K54693245K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 5.5K interactions against 971K followers, an engagement rate of 0.563%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 94% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 154K times each, and 3.54% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 15.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 64K interactions, about 12x its own typical post.

What is RJ Raunac's engagement rate on X?
RJ Raunac (@rjraunac) has an engagement rate of 0.563%, based on the median interactions across 12 original posts from the last 30 days against 971,060 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.563%, RJ Raunac sits above the 75th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @rjraunac have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 94% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @rjraunac post?
Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going