Back to @rmotta2's profile

Roberto Motta engagement report

@rmotta2 - 1.4M followers on X

Measured over 70 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.184%
of 1.4M followers
Per impression
6.60%
39K views on a typical post
Reach
2.78%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.6K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.036%
14 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.93/day
active 93% of days
Peak time
11:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 2.6K interactions against 1.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.184%. Measured over 70 original posts, its engagement rate beats 82% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 39K times each, and 6.60% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.78% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 70 posts sampled, 37% carry an image or video, 9% are part of a thread and 26% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 6.9x its own typical post.

Measured over 70 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Roberto Motta's engagement rate beats 82% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 96% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.184%, Roberto Motta sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.08% to 0.434%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.434%
p902.10%
p99160.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,521 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,166 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.434%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%230K
Monday0%286K
Tuesday-2%276K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%244K
Friday-3%252K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 27, 20266.9x their median

    A cena mais bizarra foram os entrevistadores, na vez do candidato do Missão, dizendo que Bukele violou o devido processo legal e fez julgamentos em massa. Exatamente o que aconteceu aqui, com os réus do 8 de janeiro. Simplesmente não há limite.

    15K2.2K1132595K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20266.8x their median

    Observe que a entidade que sugere a volta da exigência de diploma para quem trabalha como jornalista é a mesma que tem, na sua composição, pessoas que nunca passaram em concurso para juiz, mas exercem a função de magistrado.

    14K3.2K20310876K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20265.6x their median

    “Dispensa de diploma favorece PCC”. Realidade: https://t.co/Z0w36svexB

    11K3.1K1127164K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20265.5x their median

    Um jornalista deve perguntar e deixar o entrevistado responder. Se a resposta não foi clara, o jornalista pode pedir esclarecimento. Mas nenhum jornalista tem o direito de forçar o entrevistado a dar a uma determinada resposta - muito menos com grosseria. Especialmente se a resposta desejada pelo jornalista é a linha oficial do regime. “Vou ler a lista dos crimes novamente, candidato”. Isso não é entrevista. Isso é interrogatório.

    12K1.8K27355141K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20264.9x their median

    Que ninguém fique ofendido, mas quem precisa de um debate para decidir seu voto vai votar errado.

    11K1.5K4247875K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20263.9x their median

    Muitos jornalistas - fiquem à vontade para usar aspas - assumiram o papel de torcida de ditadores. Nunca existiu ditadura sem uma imprensa disposta a servir de capacho. Chegou a hora da colheita. “Entenda como isso pode ser bom”.

    8.2K1.6K963252K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20263.8x their median

    O ataque ao Discord é um capricho autoritário de um Estado que se preocupa tanto com crianças e jovens que liberou a maconha (40 gramas), afaga o narcotráfico (“não são terroristas”), apoia manifestações “artísticas” que sexualizam crianças, impōe ideologia de gênero, prende pais que educam filhos em casa e perdoa a mãe pelo assassinato do filho. Mas o problema é o Discord.

    7.8K1.8K743952K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20263.6x their median

    Sigilo da fonte é igual a imunidade parlamentar: é uma garantia constitucional que independe da finalidade com que ela é usada. Se a garantia só vale quando a finalidade é considerada boa pelos poderosos, então não é mais garantia, é favor. Não é dificil entender.

    7.8K1.5K1002455K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20263.4x their median

    Quem diria que o maior cabo eleitoral do Flávio seria o Fábio.

    8.3K51545390K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 20263.4x their median

    Nenhum líder socialista deveria ser rico. Quase todos são. https://t.co/6u3wTrqal5

    7.3K1.5K591451K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.6K interactions against 1.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.184%. Measured over 70 original posts, its engagement rate beats 82% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 39K times each, and 6.60% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.78% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 70 posts sampled, 37% carry an image or video, 9% are part of a thread and 26% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 6.9x its own typical post.

What is Roberto Motta's engagement rate on X?
Roberto Motta (@rmotta2) has an engagement rate of 0.184%, based on the median interactions across 70 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,404,935 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.184%, Roberto Motta sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @rmotta2 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 82% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @rmotta2 post?
Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.93 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going