Casey engagement report
@rodarmor - 1.9M followers on X
Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 166 interactions against 1.9M followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 43% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 66K times each, and 0.251% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.41% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.63 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 36% carry an image or video and 36% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 47K interactions, about 282x its own typical post.
Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Casey's engagement rate beats 43% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 24% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.009%, Casey sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.08% |
| 75th percentile | 0.431% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 160.7% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 50K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 51K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 50K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 53K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 43K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 42K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 48K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 51K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 60K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 69K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 71K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 78K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 86K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 93K |
| 14:00 UTC | -3% | 96K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 97K |
| 17:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 84K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 79K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 74K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 66K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 57K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 51K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +4% | 229K |
| Monday | 0% | 284K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 273K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 250K |
| Thursday | -2% | 243K |
| Friday | -3% | 251K |
| Saturday | +3% | 226K |
Best tweets
- May 1, 2026282x their median
Victorian-era foldable fan-parasol. Ca. 1854 -1860. https://t.co/VjugJnrU3F
- Jun 9, 2026121x their median
I just open sourced my "Is this slop?" simple test https://t.co/iNZD3QR9HS
- Jul 1, 20266.7x their median
I don't often tweet about BIP-110 because it has always been a comedically moronic project that is doomed to failure. The degree to which it won't work is fractal-like. You can zoom in to the details or zoom out to the big picture and conclude that it won't work.
- Jun 24, 20264.5x their median
Inscriptions now have social media image previews and it only took three and a half years 😅 https://t.co/gt63Un2UXy
- Jun 1, 20264.2x their median
Happy Rune June!
- Jul 29, 20264.1x their median
THE CREATOR OF ORDINALS SAYS BIP-110 IS DOOMED Casey @Rodarmor and @realizingerin dive into the history and drama behind BIP-110, Bitcoin's controversial anti-spam filter proposal. This episode covers the origins of Bitcoin's spam debate, @LukeDashjr's decade-long anti-spam crusade, the rise of Ordinals, Inscriptions, and Runes, the Bitcoin Core vs. Bitcoin Knots conflict, and a full technical breakdown of what BIP-110 actually does — and why it's doomed to fail. TIMESTAMPS 0:00 Intro 2:11 Satoshi Dice and the origin of Luke Jr's anti-spam crusade 10:20 Meta-protocols arrive: Counterparty, OmniLayer, and Tether's origins on Bitcoin 11:56 The op_return byte limit history 18:41 Why Ethereum failed 28:51 Ordinals launch in Jan 2023 40:12 Insidious motivations behind anti-Ordinals backlash and the Swanfluencers 53:42 What BIP-110 actually is and does 1:00:43 BIP-110 signaling timeline and activation dates 1:08:16 Explaining the mining difficulty adjustment problem for a minority fork 1:21:00 Why BIP-110's filters are trivial to bypass (Ordinals and Runes survive regardless) 1:25:33 Final thoughts: why the whole community should log off and move on
- Jun 25, 20263.9x their median
I was working on the promised turbo flag feature, and landed on P2P rune gambling. But it's impractical to restrict it to turbo-flag runes only. Should I turn it on for all runes? 🧵 https://t.co/5nhmGcPNh8
- Jun 10, 20262.8x their median
CASEY @RODARMOR AND @REALIZINGERIN ARE REVIEWING YOUR RUNES 👀 To submit yours, reply below with the https://t.co/CVRqTo3cY3 link or rune ticker name. If there's an esoteric backstory, we'd love to hear it. We will be reviewing and picking favorites on the next episode ❤️🔥 https://t.co/EhAAwFUAsF
- Jun 26, 20262.6x their median
🍀 LUCKY SATS 🍀 Each uncommon or rarer sat now has a luck score, equal to the luck of the block it was mined in. Lucky blocks have more leading binary zeros in the block hash than required by the difficulty target. 🧵
- Apr 22, 20262.7x their median
REVIEWING SPAM ON THE DIGITAL MEGALITH We're diving deep into the dark corners of spam on Bitcoin by reviewing inscriptions submitted by our listeners. We reviewed EVERY SINGLE INSCRIPTION, so check out what we had to say about your fav! 0:00 Intro 3:44 @lifofifo 5:15 @LeonidasNFT 7:35 @veryordinally 8:25 @thatwagmigirl 9:40 @eliherf1 11:15 @billyrestey 12:50 @boppleton 14:07 @YungGucciT 15:20 @BitcoinFrogs 15:50 @PawelDudko 18:10 @Ordinals10K 19:20 @huuep 19:50 @pizzaninjas 21:40 @ThePand3monium 23:40 @Memeticx 26:30 @blockamoto 31:00 @BravoCosto 32:50 @OrdTorches 34:10 @lukaskalm 36:55 @unfungiblehuman 38:15 @TaprootWitches 39:50 Biggest 4megger 42:10 @Satland 44:00 Mongoose 46:40 Blockavatars 47:30 @R4vonus 49:45 We love Bitmap 51:30 @rot13maxi 53:50 @ankhtoshi 57:30 @Raxonchain 1:00:50 BIP39 spell checker 1:01:50 @DanMercurius 1:05:20 OMB, @suicidetoshi 1:09:30 Bitmap web5 1:10:30 Cats on the blockchain 1:12:30 @3dOrdinalClub 1:13:30 @TheBitassets 1:15:30 @mannequinsnft 1:18:00 @richbi11 racing game 1:22:00 Dark Bitmap 1:24:00 Trump video 1:29:25 Inflatables 1:33:40 Ranking the contenders
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 166 interactions against 1.9M followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 43% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 66K times each, and 0.251% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.41% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.63 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 36% carry an image or video and 36% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 47K interactions, about 282x its own typical post.
- What is Casey's engagement rate on X?
- Casey (@rodarmor) has an engagement rate of 0.009%, based on the median interactions across 11 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,941,625 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.009%, Casey sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @rodarmor have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 43% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @rodarmor post?
- Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.63 posts per day across the measured window.