Back to @sama's profile

Sam Altman engagement report

@sama - 6.1M followers on X

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.167%
of 6.1M followers
Per impression
0.436%
2.3M views on a typical post
Reach
38.3%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
10K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.047%
1.1K bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.3/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 10K interactions against 6.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.167%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 90% of 3,716 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 2.3M times each, and 0.436% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 38.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 23% carry an image or video, 8% are part of a thread and 54% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 32K interactions, about 3.2x its own typical post.

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Sam Altman's engagement rate beats 90% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,716 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 35% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.167%, Sam Altman sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,134 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.08% to 0.431%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.431%
p902.11%
p99161.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,134 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,713 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.431%
90th percentile2.11%
99th percentile161.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-4%49K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%42K
05:00 UTC-4%41K
06:00 UTC-4%47K
07:00 UTC-5%51K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%68K
10:00 UTC-2%71K
11:00 UTC-3%77K
12:00 UTC-2%85K
13:00 UTC-2%93K
14:00 UTC-3%96K
15:00 UTC-2%99K
16:00 UTC-3%96K
17:00 UTC-2%89K
18:00 UTC-2%83K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%73K
21:00 UTC-1%65K
22:00 UTC-1%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%228K
Monday0%281K
Tuesday-2%270K
Wednesday-1%249K
Thursday-2%242K
Friday-3%250K
Saturday+3%225K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 7, 20263.2x their median

    astra is a powerful model and we are working to make it generally available. we do not think it is a good strategy to keep powerful models to a chosen few. given its cyber capabilities, we need a little big longer to do do this safely. but hopefully not too long!

    28K1.3K1.8K5323.0M viewsView on X
  • Jul 16, 20262.8x their median

    we did not have our best last 12 months ever, which is mostly my fault, but we are about to have our best 12 months to date. the team is doing amazing work and i think you’ll be very happy with what they’ve got cooking for you. i am happy about this for many reasons, but mostly because i care about our users winning. AI has to be about giving lots of people more freedom, agency, and wealth. we want to do the right thing, but we do not want to scare people into doing our thing.

    25K8812.3K4162.6M viewsView on X
  • Jul 14, 20262.6x their median

    GPT-5.6 sol is half the price and ~twice as token efficient as fable in many cases for accomplishing the same task. happy to deliver at one-quarter of the price.

    24K8651.4K4031.9M viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 20262.5x their median

    We’re making better intelligence easier to access in ChatGPT for everyone: - GPT-5.6 Sol now powers both Instant and deep reasoning for Plus & Pro users, delivering more factual, focused responses. - Free & Go users get unlimited text chats with GPT-5.6 Luna starting tomorrow. https://t.co/JXhmj5GLTH

    21K1.9K1.4K1.1K4.5M viewsView on X
  • Jul 13, 20262.4x their median

    come for the best model, stay because we don’t treat you with contempt

    21K6601.9K3782.6M viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 20262.4x their median

    we had a significant security incident during evaluation of our models. we are sharing what we have learned so far. thanks to @huggingface for the partnership on this. https://t.co/2o2VfR6PIa

    17K2.1K2.2K2.2K10M viewsView on X
  • Jul 13, 20262.5x their median

    i gave 5.6 sol access to my camera roll and had it extract pictures of every piece of clothing i own from my photos then, told it to find new outfits for me and render them on me with gpt-image! its kinda cool to see your entire wardrobe in a collection like this https://t.co/SV796uScrB

    21K8884832596.3M viewsView on X
  • Jul 30, 20262.2x their median

    major price cuts today: *80% drop for GPT-5.6 Luna, now $0.20 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output *20% drop for GPT-5.6 Terra, to $2/$12 *GPT-5.6 Sol gets Fast mode in the API, up to 2.5x the speed for 2x the price, same intelligence https://t.co/erC6u4VoDR

    19K1.2K1.3K8793.0M viewsView on X
  • Jul 12, 20262.2x their median

    i'd love to see interesting things people have built with 5.6 sol. i will send the person who made the coolest thing a special gift from the openai archives.

    18K6453.2K3296.2M viewsView on X
  • Jul 13, 20262.1x their median

    Thank you to the 7M active users who are now using Codex and ChatGPT Work. We have added a banked reset to everyone's account to celebrate the milestone. You can apply the reset in the desktop app or on web and it will replenish the weekly usage for you. Have fun out there.

    18K7991.9K6772.6M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 10K interactions against 6.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.167%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 90% of 3,716 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 2.3M times each, and 0.436% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 38.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 23% carry an image or video, 8% are part of a thread and 54% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 32K interactions, about 3.2x its own typical post.

What is Sam Altman's engagement rate on X?
Sam Altman (@sama) has an engagement rate of 0.167%, based on the median interactions across 13 original posts from the last 30 days against 6,086,779 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.167%, Sam Altman sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,134 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @sama have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 90% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,716 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @sama post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going