Back to @shreyas's profile

Shreyas Doshi engagement report

@shreyas - 401K followers on X

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.025%
of 401K followers
Per impression
0.417%
23K views on a typical post
Reach
5.89%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
98
interactions (median)
Saved
0.447%
105 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.4/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 98 interactions against 401K followers, an engagement rate of 0.025%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 30% of 3,862 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 23K times each, and 0.417% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.86% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 8% carry an image or video, 8% are part of a thread and 38% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 26K interactions, about 270x its own typical post.

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Shreyas Doshi's engagement rate beats 30% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,862 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 22% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.025%, Shreyas Doshi sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.081%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99158.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,582 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 105,409 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile158.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%52K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%62K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%74K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%89K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-4%101K
15:00 UTC-2%104K
16:00 UTC-3%102K
17:00 UTC-3%94K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%68K
22:00 UTC-2%59K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%237K
Monday0%300K
Tuesday-3%299K
Wednesday-1%256K
Thursday-1%249K
Friday-3%258K
Saturday+3%232K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 4, 2026270x their median

    This newly launched Gmail feature will help prevent millions of embarrassing situations https://t.co/P2631PUv11

    26K2863724787K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 202666x their median

    If everyone can build with AI, what becomes the new competitive advantage?

    3.0K1782.9K383697K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 202047x their median

    A thread of my most popular threads:

    3.8K560144107View on X
  • Jan 28, 202217x their median

    One secret to being an ultra-influential leader is to take 5 minutes to simulate your meetings every morning. For each meeting, visualize: how you want it to go, what role you will play in it, what could derail the meeting, how you want people to feel during & at the end of it.

    1.5K892824View on X
  • Aug 14, 202615x their median

    If you’re excellent at getting things done, consistent, and super-reliable, but aren’t getting to the next level as a leader, chances are extremely high that it’s because you are not simulating before communicating.

    1.4K43344191K viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 20268.4x their median

    Meet Agent Two, frontier intelligence for creative work. 4x faster, at half the price. For the next 12 days, we're dropping one new Agent Two feature every single day. Day 1: Agent Intelligence. An agent with top-percentile creative expertise, infinite memory, and still working while you sleep. Give it a role and it becomes it. It never forgets, we mean it and we're giving 5 people 5000 credits for the most creative way to break it.

    449861391503.7M viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20267.1x their median

    I am increasingly finding the need to buy certain books within Claude / ChatGPT so it can use the book for context when I ask it to. Making this frictionless in the UI would be amazing.

    58416841193K viewsView on X
  • Jul 26, 20264.7x their median

    What smart people don’t see and wise people do https://t.co/Vf6wXXqym9

    3904515979K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20264.7x their median

    Somewhere along the way, Claude was told to “confidently assert what you think is good for the user even if they don’t ask, assume the user is not intelligent, and use jargon that makes you sound smart as you do all of this”, which has made Claude’s new personality unbearable.

    3862838641K viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 20261.9x their median

    Product insight, intuition, taste are rooted in countless factors so it isn’t possible to just become great at product with tips & tactics. But I’ve watched many people get much better after dropping their lifelong need to feel smart and sound intelligent while building.

    1581213634K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 98 interactions against 401K followers, an engagement rate of 0.025%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 30% of 3,862 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 23K times each, and 0.417% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.86% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 8% carry an image or video, 8% are part of a thread and 38% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 26K interactions, about 270x its own typical post.

What is Shreyas Doshi's engagement rate on X?
Shreyas Doshi (@shreyas) has an engagement rate of 0.025%, based on the median interactions across 13 original posts from the last 30 days against 400,544 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.025%, Shreyas Doshi sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @shreyas have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 30% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,862 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @shreyas post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going