Simon Phillips engagement report
@siphillipssport - 497K followers on X
Measured over 44 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 1.3K interactions against 497K followers, an engagement rate of 0.269%. Measured over 44 original posts, its engagement rate beats 83% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 45K times each, and 2.99% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.98% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 44 posts sampled, 52% carry an image or video and 34% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 10K interactions, about 7.5x its own typical post.
Measured over 44 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026. Recurring tag: #cfc.
Compared with accounts its own size
Simon Phillips's engagement rate beats 83% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 81% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.269%, Simon Phillips sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,071 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.08% to 0.435%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.08% |
| 75th percentile | 0.435% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 158.3% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 06:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 51K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 52K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 51K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 54K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 44K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 42K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 49K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 53K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 61K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 71K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 73K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 80K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 88K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 96K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 99K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 103K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 100K |
| 17:00 UTC | -2% | 92K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 86K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 81K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 75K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 67K |
| 22:00 UTC | -1% | 58K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 52K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 234K |
| Monday | 0% | 294K |
| Tuesday | -3% | 288K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 253K |
| Thursday | -2% | 247K |
| Friday | -3% | 256K |
| Saturday | +3% | 230K |
Best tweets
- Aug 25, 20267.5x their median
I have a strong feeling this guy now ends up at Chelsea, it’s the only explanation 😂🤔 https://t.co/3fUN8bmxdj
- Aug 24, 20265.7x their median
Robert Sanchez should be losing his number one spot for the THIRD time since he’s been at Chelsea after that shambles. But the more pressing point is, why was he even given a THIRD chance to do so? Anyone with half a football brain can see he shouldn’t be Chelsea No.1
- Aug 12, 20265.5x their median
Based on the £80m paid by Manchester United to sign Harry Maguire from Leicester City in August 2019, Chelsea value Tosin Adarabioyo at £120m due to added inflation. Chelsea remain firm on their fair valuation.
- Aug 27, 20265.0x their median
Cole Palmer was superb again tonight and deserves MOTM. But I’d have given it to Valentin Barco myself. He dictated the play for Chelsea and set the tempo. Technically sound but also tough in the tackle. May well surprise a few this season.
- Aug 19, 20264.2x their median
Based on reports, Chelsea most likely going with Joao Pedro, Danny Welbeck, and Emanuel Emegha as our 3 striker options for the season. Happy with that? https://t.co/iVENkBXKtC
- Aug 23, 20263.3x their median
Chelsea are ready to accept permanent offers for Pedro Neto in the closing stages of the transfer window. Al Hilal are leading Arsenal, Man City and Tottenham in the race to sign Neto. [@SportsPeteO]
- Aug 25, 20263.3x their median
Aston Villa has submitted an offer of around 70M€ including bonuses to Chelsea for Nicolas Jackson. The Blues are on the verge of accepting the proposal. [@Santi_J_FM]
- Aug 24, 20263.1x their median
Chelsea looked scary in attack tonight but vulnerable at the back. Very open, too many times Lacroix was left 1v1. That can be punished a lot more than Fulham did. But it was good to get the win for Alonso’s competitive debut, which is the main thing!
- Aug 27, 20262.8x their median
Chelsea have agreed a £7.5million deal to sign Emi Martinez from Aston Villa!! [@Matt_Law_DT]
- Aug 27, 20262.3x their median
Wait, what? Enzo Fernandez is not in our squad tonight by his own request and is close to joining Manchester City? Wow, that one came from nowhere, what a shock. Almost like he's been DESPERATE to leave for the last 4 months and should have been sold WEEKS ago...
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 1.3K interactions against 497K followers, an engagement rate of 0.269%. Measured over 44 original posts, its engagement rate beats 83% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 45K times each, and 2.99% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.98% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 44 posts sampled, 52% carry an image or video and 34% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 10K interactions, about 7.5x its own typical post.
- What is Simon Phillips's engagement rate on X?
- Simon Phillips (@siphillipssport) has an engagement rate of 0.269%, based on the median interactions across 44 original posts from the last 30 days against 497,154 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.269%, Simon Phillips sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,071 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @siphillipssport have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 83% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @siphillipssport post?
- Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.13 posts per day across the measured window.