Back to @siphillipssport's profile

Simon Phillips engagement report

@siphillipssport - 497K followers on X

Measured over 44 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.269%
of 497K followers
Per impression
2.99%
45K views on a typical post
Reach
9.00%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.3K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.017%
8 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.13/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
06:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 1.3K interactions against 497K followers, an engagement rate of 0.269%. Measured over 44 original posts, its engagement rate beats 83% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 45K times each, and 2.99% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.98% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 44 posts sampled, 52% carry an image or video and 34% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 10K interactions, about 7.5x its own typical post.

Measured over 44 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026. Recurring tag: #cfc.

Compared with accounts its own size

Simon Phillips's engagement rate beats 83% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 81% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.269%, Simon Phillips sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,071 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.08% to 0.435%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.435%
p902.10%
p99158.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,071 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 105,527 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.435%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile158.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 06:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%71K
10:00 UTC-2%73K
11:00 UTC-3%80K
12:00 UTC-2%88K
13:00 UTC-2%96K
14:00 UTC-4%99K
15:00 UTC-2%103K
16:00 UTC-3%100K
17:00 UTC-2%92K
18:00 UTC-1%86K
19:00 UTC-2%81K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%67K
22:00 UTC-1%58K
23:00 UTC-1%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%234K
Monday0%294K
Tuesday-3%288K
Wednesday-1%253K
Thursday-2%247K
Friday-3%256K
Saturday+3%230K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 25, 20267.5x their median

    I have a strong feeling this guy now ends up at Chelsea, it’s the only explanation 😂🤔 https://t.co/3fUN8bmxdj

    9.2K407273134480K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20265.7x their median

    Robert Sanchez should be losing his number one spot for the THIRD time since he’s been at Chelsea after that shambles. But the more pressing point is, why was he even given a THIRD chance to do so? Anyone with half a football brain can see he shouldn’t be Chelsea No.1

    6.7K76417430132K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20265.5x their median

    Based on the £80m paid by Manchester United to sign Harry Maguire from Leicester City in August 2019, Chelsea value Tosin Adarabioyo at £120m due to added inflation. Chelsea remain firm on their fair valuation.

    6.3K334483248297K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20265.0x their median

    Cole Palmer was superb again tonight and deserves MOTM. But I’d have given it to Valentin Barco myself. He dictated the play for Chelsea and set the tempo. Technically sound but also tough in the tackle. May well surprise a few this season.

    6.3K334541172K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20264.2x their median

    Based on reports, Chelsea most likely going with Joao Pedro, Danny Welbeck, and Emanuel Emegha as our 3 striker options for the season. Happy with that? https://t.co/iVENkBXKtC

    5.0K263218107175K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20263.3x their median

    Chelsea are ready to accept permanent offers for Pedro Neto in the closing stages of the transfer window. Al Hilal are leading Arsenal, Man City and Tottenham in the race to sign Neto. [@SportsPeteO]

    4.0K2635223106K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20263.3x their median

    Aston Villa has submitted an offer of around 70M€ including bonuses to Chelsea for Nicolas Jackson. The Blues are on the verge of accepting the proposal. [@Santi_J_FM]

    4.0K249473689K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20263.1x their median

    Chelsea looked scary in attack tonight but vulnerable at the back. Very open, too many times Lacroix was left 1v1. That can be punished a lot more than Fulham did. But it was good to get the win for Alonso’s competitive debut, which is the main thing!

    3.8K213481167K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20262.8x their median

    Chelsea have agreed a £7.5million deal to sign Emi Martinez from Aston Villa!! [@Matt_Law_DT]

    3.5K193582687K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20262.3x their median

    Wait, what? Enzo Fernandez is not in our squad tonight by his own request and is close to joining Manchester City? Wow, that one came from nowhere, what a shock. Almost like he's been DESPERATE to leave for the last 4 months and should have been sold WEEKS ago...

    2.8K1558211123K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#cfc

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.3K interactions against 497K followers, an engagement rate of 0.269%. Measured over 44 original posts, its engagement rate beats 83% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 45K times each, and 2.99% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.98% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 44 posts sampled, 52% carry an image or video and 34% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 10K interactions, about 7.5x its own typical post.

What is Simon Phillips's engagement rate on X?
Simon Phillips (@siphillipssport) has an engagement rate of 0.269%, based on the median interactions across 44 original posts from the last 30 days against 497,154 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.269%, Simon Phillips sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,071 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @siphillipssport have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 83% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @siphillipssport post?
Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going