Back to @staceyabrams's profile

Stacey Abrams engagement report

@staceyabrams - 2.4M followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.008%
of 2.4M followers
Per impression
0.853%
22K views on a typical post
Reach
0.89%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
186
interactions (median)
Saved
0.023%
5 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.43/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 186 interactions against 2.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.008%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 41% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 22K times each, and 0.853% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.894% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.43 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 38% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 215K interactions, about 1161x its own typical post.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026. Recurring tag: #gapol.

Compared with accounts its own size

Stacey Abrams's engagement rate beats 41% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 52% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.008%, Stacey Abrams sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.434%
p902.10%
p99160.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,521 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,166 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.434%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%230K
Monday0%286K
Tuesday-2%276K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%244K
Friday-3%252K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • May 21, 20261161x their median

    AOC: This is what drinking water in Georgia looks like after Meta began data center construction in the community. https://t.co/oXk11U46ja

    174K35K3.0K2.3K20M viewsView on X
  • Jun 17, 202663x their median

    Statement from the Abrams family. https://t.co/fGhpCr3uhJ

    9.7K90894664245K viewsView on X
  • May 25, 202636x their median

    Originally called Decoration Day, Black Americans interred the bodies of fallen Union soldiers to honor their sacrifice — now known as Memorial Day. Decades later, my great-grandfather served our nation in WWI. Then my grandfather took post in WWII and the Korean War. Today and every day, I honor their sacrifice by fighting for rights they were denied in a country they loved, knowing freedom will prevail if we refuse to give up the battle.

    5.2K1.2K21417100K viewsView on X
  • Jul 17, 202631x their median

    Donald Trump just used a primetime address to relitigate an election he lost six years ago — and to demand new laws making it harder to vote. Americans see through the lies. He tried this in Georgia first: a call to "find 11,780 votes," a raid on Fulton County, and now a war on the ballot itself. That's not democracy. That's cowardice. America, we've beaten it before.

    4.8K8102361384K viewsView on X
  • Jun 17, 202629x their median

    One of my favorite pictures with my father, Reverend Robert Lee Abrams. He and Mom built a beautiful family and filled it with faith, courage, service, laughter, and love. You left so much good behind, Dad. We love you. (Not pictured: our youngest brother, Walter Abrams.) Photo: @annieleibovitz

    4.8K4261991560K viewsView on X
  • May 2, 202617x their median

    Look who dropped by yesterday morning as we were moving into our Southside B’ham HQ. Stacey Abrams reminded us that we have to move so much more in this election. We have to move hearts and minds and importantly souls to the polls. Thank you Stacey for your great work and for your endorsement of our campaign to change Alabama.

    2.4K4962311981K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 202617x their median

    Sixty-one years after the Voting Rights Act became law, its promise is once again under attack. They target Black voting power first because they believe we are the easiest to silence—but their ultimate goal is to dismantle democracy for us all. As I told @MichaelSteele last night: We have the power. We have the agency. We have the numbers. And every time we rise, unite and vote, we prove that our power is real.

    2.3K6161411179K viewsView on X
  • Jun 3, 202611x their median

    🚨 The Supreme Court just let Alabama Republicans change the rules and use a racist congressional map for this year’s midterm elections. It’s time for us to organize, mobilize, and vote like we’ve never voted before! https://t.co/p2rWMuMJmi

    1.1K4775052341K viewsView on X
  • Jun 19, 20269.7x their median

    Those attacking our voting rights are afraid of the power we hold and how we’ve poured into this nation’s story. This #Juneteenth, we celebrate and honor the fight of those who came before us. Our mission in this moment is unmistakable: push on until our full freedom is finally realized.

    1.4K3011131128K viewsView on X
  • May 12, 20269.2x their median

    My statement on Georgia Senate Republicans' sham hearing: https://t.co/i6pY3vfTgG

    1.2K3611821149K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#gapol

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 186 interactions against 2.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.008%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 41% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 22K times each, and 0.853% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.894% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.43 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 38% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 215K interactions, about 1161x its own typical post.

What is Stacey Abrams's engagement rate on X?
Stacey Abrams (@staceyabrams) has an engagement rate of 0.008%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,443,303 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.008%, Stacey Abrams sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @staceyabrams have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 41% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @staceyabrams post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.43 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going