Back to @ston_fi's profile

STON.fi engagement report

@ston_fi - 475K followers on X

Measured over 42 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.029%
of 475K followers
Per impression
1.30%
11K views on a typical post
Reach
2.26%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
140
interactions (median)
Saved
0.037%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.87/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
11:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 140 interactions against 475K followers, an engagement rate of 0.029%. Measured over 42 original posts, its engagement rate beats 47% of 3,848 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 1.30% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.26% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 42 posts sampled, 45% carry an image or video, 24% are part of a thread and 12% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 522 interactions, about 3.7x its own typical post.

Measured over 42 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

STON.fi's engagement rate beats 47% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,848 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 58% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.029%, STON.fi sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,214 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.081%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.436%
p902.10%
p99160.2%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,214 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,785 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.436%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.2%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%71K
10:00 UTC-2%73K
11:00 UTC-3%80K
12:00 UTC-2%88K
13:00 UTC-2%96K
14:00 UTC-4%99K
15:00 UTC-2%103K
16:00 UTC-3%100K
17:00 UTC-2%92K
18:00 UTC-1%86K
19:00 UTC-2%81K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%67K
22:00 UTC-1%58K
23:00 UTC-1%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%234K
Monday0%294K
Tuesday-3%288K
Wednesday-1%253K
Thursday-2%247K
Friday-3%256K
Saturday+3%230K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jul 21, 20263.7x their median

    TRON @trondao cross-chain swaps are now live on STONfi 🌉 STONfi now connects TON with TRON and major EVM networks, bringing one of crypto’s largest stablecoin ecosystems into one self-custodial swap flow. Users can swap supported stablecoins across connected chains without extra tabs, bridges, or interfaces: • USDT on TON • USDT on TRON • USDT and USDC on Ethereum, BNB Chain, Base, Avalanche • USDT0 and USDC on Arbitrum • PUSD and USDC on Polygon • USDG на Robinhood Chain Under the hood, Omniston coordinates the full cross-chain flow from quote to settlement. You see the exact amount before confirming — and that’s what arrives. Most swaps complete in 15–40 seconds. Initial limit: $1,000 per transaction. Every new network brings us closer to making "cross-chain" disappear for users. Try TRON cross-chain swaps on STONfi — link in comments 👇 #TON #TRON #STONfi #Omniston #DeFi #CrossChain #Stablecoins #USDT #USDC #Web3

    30269975454K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20262.3x their median

    Happy Birthday, @telegram 🎉 From chats to mini apps, communities, and Gram. Thanks for giving an entire ecosystem a place to grow. 💎

    2383247624K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20262.1x their median

    Live Aug 20 — Gram Wallet Is Coming to Telegram. What Are You Going to Build? Telegram is preparing to bring a native non-custodial Gram Wallet, potentially bringing a new wave of users and builders to TON. Together with @LAMBOtokenTON, @GramStoreApp and @dtrade_tg we’ll explore what this could look like. We’re going live to discuss: • What these examples tell us about the next generation of Telegram-native crypto products • What these teams are building and how users experience their products • The technical and product challenges they had to solve • How STONfi infrastructure works underneath 👀 We’ll run a live community poll, with the results brought into the discussion. 🎁 150 STON prize pool — stay until the end for a question from the speakers and submit your answer under the event post on X by August 21 at 15:00 UTC for a chance to win: • 70 STON for the best answer • 40 STON each for 2 random winners 📅 Aug 20 · 15:00 UTC #TON #DeFi #Telegram #Web3 #STONfi

    16152563120K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20261.9x their median

    🗿 Gram Wallet is coming to Telegram: 3 signals of what comes next A native non-custodial Gram Wallet inside Telegram can become more than just another wallet launch. It could change how users discover, fund, and return to Telegram-native crypto products. We went live with @LAMBOtokenTON, @GramStoreApp and @dtrade_tg to understand what the Gram Wallet launch could mean for the teams building around it. Here are 3 takeaways from this discussion: 1️⃣ Gram Wallet could make crypto feel invisible. Telegram already has the distribution with 1B+ users. The bigger shift could come from embedding self-custody directly into the app and making transactions feel instant and, potentially, zero-fee for users. 2️⃣ “Zero-fee” could mean invisible gas, not free transactions. The discussion touched on sponsored or relay-paid gas covering transaction costs behind the scenes. If that model scales, gasless transactions could become a much bigger part of the TON experience. 3️⃣ Getting users in is only the first step. The discussion also touched on how Telegram-native apps may need to measure success through actual onchain activity and revenue, rather than simply counting users. 📊 We also brought the community into the discussion with a live poll on what could matter most for turning easier crypto access into real onchain activity. Giving users a reason to come back came first at 31%, ahead of connecting TON to external liquidity (25%) and making DeFi easier to understand (23%). ⚡In other words, easier access alone is not enough — users still need a reason to stay. What do you think Gram Wallet could change? Share your take in the comments! Missed the session? Watch the full discussion — link in the comments 👇 #TON #DeFi #Telegram #Web3 #STONfi

    14537492812K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20261.7x their median

    🗿 https://t.co/DiAb69er5l Ranks Top 4 Among TON Apps Stonfiers! Our protocol is #4 out of 100 TON apps by monthly financially active wallets, right behind centralized giants like Bybit, and #1 among all DeFi protocols on TON. Self-custody keeps users coming back to https://t.co/DiAb69er5l, swap after swap, without ever giving up control of their assets. Drop a 🥇 if your wallet was one of the 14,000 financially active on https://t.co/DiAb69er5l this month. Stay tuned — there are many more milestones for us to celebrate together!

    12923473416K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20261.6x their median

    🗿 STONfi leads TON DeFi with ~78% of DEX swap volume! Recent TON stats show a strong picture: STONfi holds ~78% of all TON DEX swapping volume. That is nearly 5× more than the #2 venue. STONfi also has the largest user base among this type of protocols, with ~59% of users — about 1.6× more than the runner-up. Even these numbers do not capture the full picture. Through Omniston, STONfi aggregates TON liquidity across multiple sources, so its real contribution to swap execution is broader than standard stats indicate. That makes STONfi not just a major venue, but one of the core execution layers of TON DeFi. Thanks for swapping, building, and growing with us. Stay tuned — there's more ahead.

    12135432616K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20261.6x their median

    Let’s take a closer look at the stonbassadors’ July results! 🔵 Stonbassadors create content about STONfi and receive monthly rewards for their contributions. Here’s how we closed July: ✅ 12,554 STON (~$5,500) distributed ✅ 481 stonbassadors rewarded ✅ Top creators reached hundreds of thousands of views across multiple platforms and earned up to $300 each ✅ Rewards were distributed just 7 days after the end of the month thanks to an improved review process Want to become one of the top stonbassadors? Find the program link below 👇 #TON #stonbassadors #STONfi

    13132481412K viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 20261.5x their median

    Clear DeFi thinking starts with the STONfi blog! 🔍 What you’ll find in our blog: • STONchronicles — product updates and ecosystem developments • https://t.co/DiAb69er5l Academy — step-by-step guides and plain-language DeFi explainers • Cross-chain content — swaps, liquidity strategies, risks, and technical details • Blockchain Pop — the lighter cultural side of Web3 Read the latest articles, revisit the fundamentals, and build a clearer picture of what’s happening across TON and the wider blockchain ecosystem. What would you like us to cover next? Explore the STONfi blog and share your ideas in the comments 👇 #TON #STONfi #DeFi #Web3 #Crypto #Blockchain #CrossChain

    11629511913K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20261.5x their median

    Hyperliquid perps land in Telegram via WenLong and Omniston ⚡️ WenLong, built by @lambotokenton, brings Hyperliquid inside Telegram: leveraged perps on crypto and tokenized assets, available in a few taps straight from a TON wallet. 💎 Where Omniston comes in: • Opening a Hyperliquid position from Telegram means moving assets across chains first. • WenLong uses Omniston to swap USDT on TON into USDC on Arbitrum, then routes it straight into a Hyperliquid deposit — all inside one flow. • Users deposit in GRAM or USDT and go from a Telegram bot to an open leveraged position without leaving the app. Try Hyperliquid perps on WenLong — link in comments 👇 👀 WenLong is an independent app using STONfi infrastructure. STONfi is not affiliated with, and does not endorse or recommend it. DYOR and assess risks before use. #TON #STONfi #Omniston #Hyperliquid #DeFi #Perps #TelegramMiniApps #CrossChain

    12132342613K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 2026

    Cross-chain swaps on STONfi just got easier with custom address 📬 Need to send tokens to a friend or make a payment quickly? With the custom address option, you can send swapped tokens straight to any address on any supported destination chain — without connecting it in the dApp! How it works: 1️⃣ Turn on Receive to custom address 2️⃣ Paste the destination address 3️⃣ Omniston delivers the swapped tokens directly to the specified wallet Supported routes: • USDT on TON • USDT on TRON • USDT and USDC on Ethereum, BNB Chain, Base, Avalanche • USDT0 and USDC on Arbitrum • PUSD and USDC on Polygon • USDG on Robinhood Chain 👀 Make sure to connect the source-chain wallet in the interface and always double-check the address and destination chain before confirming. Try cross-chain swaps on STONfi — link in comments 👇 #STONfi #Omniston #TON #DeFi #CrossChain #Stablecoins #USDT #USDC

    11532401510K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 140 interactions against 475K followers, an engagement rate of 0.029%. Measured over 42 original posts, its engagement rate beats 47% of 3,848 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 1.30% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.26% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 42 posts sampled, 45% carry an image or video, 24% are part of a thread and 12% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 522 interactions, about 3.7x its own typical post.

What is STON.fi's engagement rate on X?
STON.fi (@ston_fi) has an engagement rate of 0.029%, based on the median interactions across 42 original posts from the last 30 days against 475,361 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.029%, STON.fi sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,214 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ston_fi have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 47% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,848 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ston_fi post?
Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.87 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going

STON.fi (@ston_fi) Engagement Rate - 0.029% | PlayerSells