Back to @thetimes's profile

The Times and Sunday Times engagement report

@thetimes - 1.7M followers on X

Measured over 332 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0%
of 1.7M followers
Per impression
0.061%
7.4K views on a typical post
Reach
0.43%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
4
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
11.37/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 4 interactions against 1.7M followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 332 original posts, its engagement rate beats 9% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 7.4K times each, and 0.061% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.426% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 11.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 332 posts sampled, 99% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 856 interactions, about 214x its own typical post.

Measured over 332 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

The Times and Sunday Times's engagement rate beats 9% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 4% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At under 0.001%, The Times and Sunday Times sits below the 10th percentile of the 37,071 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.435%
p902.10%
p99158.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,071 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 105,527 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.435%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile158.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%71K
10:00 UTC-2%73K
11:00 UTC-3%80K
12:00 UTC-2%88K
13:00 UTC-2%96K
14:00 UTC-4%99K
15:00 UTC-2%103K
16:00 UTC-3%100K
17:00 UTC-2%92K
18:00 UTC-1%86K
19:00 UTC-2%81K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%67K
22:00 UTC-1%58K
23:00 UTC-1%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%234K
Monday0%294K
Tuesday-3%288K
Wednesday-1%253K
Thursday-2%247K
Friday-3%256K
Saturday+3%230K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 24, 2026214x their median

    Prince Harry removed from board of African Parks charity https://t.co/uC2bklwNYz

    67985781438K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 2026199x their median

    Public want Prince William and Prince Harry to reconcile https://t.co/XlA4QLLuP7

    6696764330K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 2026103x their median

    Americans fell out of love after Meghan and Harry dished the dirt https://t.co/ickQbaKtkr

    3062277620K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 202662x their median

    Harry’s return might force the Waleses to work harder for the King https://t.co/vNtVBnl8OB

    101101271022K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202654x their median

    "London’s reputation has been allowed to slip, and its problems left to fester. It needs the new energy that a native Londoner and Conservative can bring" | ✍️ @JamesCleverly https://t.co/AlUiPMjoWD

    1603215926K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202638x their median

    Grooming gangs linked to 150 violent and drug-dealing criminals https://t.co/x7GHiU6Lpa

    88508714K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 202637x their median

    William Hague reveals that Jon Culshaw got through to then-prime minister Tony Blair by doing an impression of him, until he made one mistake: “Blair only realised it wasn’t me when he kept calling him Tony because I always insisted on calling him prime minister. But otherwise he would not have known, I think.” @WilliamJHague @StigAbell @rosiewright99

    134112257K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 202628x their median

    🚨 Scandal-hit @nottmhospitals has repeatedly lost vital medical data, equipment and even human tissue hampering multiple investigations into patient deaths, a coroner has said. It follows the death of 27-yr-old Jen Birch during a routine day case surgery: https://t.co/vFE7Sg3C1A

    57446415K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202623x their median

    🔺 EXCLUSIVE: @JamesCleverly is stepping down from the shadow cabinet so he can run to be the next mayor of London https://t.co/rUYf0SZB7A

    70116416K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202619x their median

    King Harald V of Norway in ‘extremely serious’ condition https://t.co/HrwkyDNdIg

    60115018K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 4 interactions against 1.7M followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 332 original posts, its engagement rate beats 9% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 7.4K times each, and 0.061% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.426% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 11.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 332 posts sampled, 99% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 856 interactions, about 214x its own typical post.

What is The Times and Sunday Times's engagement rate on X?
The Times and Sunday Times (@thetimes) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 332 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,725,450 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At under 0.001%, The Times and Sunday Times sits below the 10th percentile of the 37,071 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @thetimes have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 9% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @thetimes post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 11.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going