Viva Frei engagement report
@thevivafrei - 755K followers on X
Measured over 65 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 116 interactions against 755K followers, an engagement rate of 0.015%. Measured over 65 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 0.592% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.60% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 65 posts sampled, 66% carry an image or video, 29% are part of a thread and 28% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 30K interactions, about 260x its own typical post.
Measured over 65 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Viva Frei's engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 38% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.015%, Viva Frei sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,071 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.08% |
| 75th percentile | 0.435% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 158.3% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 51K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 52K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 51K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 54K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 44K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 42K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 49K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 53K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 61K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 71K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 73K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 80K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 88K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 96K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 99K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 103K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 100K |
| 17:00 UTC | -2% | 92K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 86K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 81K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 75K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 67K |
| 22:00 UTC | -1% | 58K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 52K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 234K |
| Monday | 0% | 294K |
| Tuesday | -3% | 288K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 253K |
| Thursday | -2% | 247K |
| Friday | -3% | 256K |
| Saturday | +3% | 230K |
Best tweets
- Aug 27, 2026260x their median
This dude caught a fish and noticed an eagle had its eyes locked on it so he did the most unexpected thing https://t.co/rJuxJNl8r0
- Aug 31, 2026106x their median
Unless we wrap this shit up in the Middle East ASAP, the midterms are going to be very, very ugly. Be mad at me all you want to. But I’m not going to lie to you.
- Aug 27, 202696x their median
🧐 https://t.co/T1FlfitXoG
- Feb 21, 202187x their median
The real lesson of that Capitol event is that the FBI can’t find out who planted bombs the night before at the DNC and RNC. They are big tough guys when going after MAGA granny’s tho.
- Feb 10, 202177x their median
Has the FBI found who planted those bombs at the RNC the night before the January 6 Capitol event?
- Aug 19, 202646x their median
The “same, lindsay” trend is weird and disturbing + I debunk some of the claims surrounding Patrick Clancy https://t.co/bT7rHGwUzF
- Aug 25, 202645x their median
Here’s a question not enough people are asking: Will Mark Carney‘s firm Brookfield Asset Management suffer or benefit from a US - Canada trade war? Spoiler: The answer is benefit. Nothing like having a cool $53 billion of assets in China and India while triggering a trade war with America. The country where half of BAM’s assets under management are locaternvested. It’s almost predictably diabolical.
- Aug 30, 202622x their median
🚨“Coming home!”🚨 According to yesterday’s late-day filing by the @thejusticedept in opposition to Brian Cole Jr.’s evidentiary subpoenas, former @CapitolPolice officer Shauni Kerkhoff texted her boyfriend, Dan Dickert, at 5:18:55 p.m. on January 5, 2021, stating, “Coming home!” Yeah. Well. Maybe. But not quite yet. You see … at exactly 5:18:37 p.m. -- only 18 seconds earlier -- Kerkhoff was in the Capitol Police CDU van pictured below, caught on Capitol CCTV camera #1854, at the intersection of 2nd St and C St NE. She had only minutes earlier entered this van at USCP headquarters with two other USCP officers, and at this moment — contrary to what the Government revealed — she was not “Coming home”; she was on her way to the Fairchild Building … located just a block away from the DNC HQ. She soon left the Fairchild with another officer in a different vehicle and returned to USCP HQ. But … did she then go home? More on that tomorrow or Monday. (I told you this was going to be fun.) And for a quick ‘bottom line’ on what this latest filing means for Brian Cole Jr., this is “Our” Department of Justice asking the Judge to deny Cole’s defense team the evidence they’ve requested. Set aside all the legal mumbo-jumbo … and that’s all this is. The government is not interested in justice; they just want to win. If they cared about justice, they’d be willing to hand over everything and allow the truth to prevail. But that is the sorry state of our justice system today. Oh. Don’t believe me when I say this is “Our” Dept. of Justice. Or you’re offended at the implication that by “Our” I mean The Trump Administration’s Dept. of Justice? This is how the 28-page motion to deny evidence is signed: “For the foregoing reasons, the government respectfully requests that the Court deny the defendant’s renewed motion for Rule 17(c) subpoenas. Respectfully Submitted, JEANINE FERRIS PIRRO UNITED STATES ATTORNEY @USAttyPirro @JudgeJeanine Sooooooooo…… 🤷♂️ Remember ... Pirro was part of that celebration press conference on the evening of Cole's arrest, and her good friend Jocelyn Ballantine is leading the prosecution of Cole's case. The Government's full filing is here: https://t.co/6DnR9mmgD2
- Aug 21, 202614x their median
The more she talks… Everyone needs to appreciate what @RealCandaceO just admitted to here. “The footage that you saw in court, that I saw in court, was in effect modified”. Do you understand what that means? It means that the original foot wasn’t modified, but because of the format it was in (fisheye/surveillance video) it was “in effect” modified. Meaning that she (or more likely her government source) modified the video/still frame to “correct” the manner in which the surveillance video was “in effect modified”. I will be revisiting my original post to make sure the community note is taken down. This is exactly what I have been saying from the beginning. Her government source corrected the original surveillance video to make it look “normal”, because the original surveillance video that was actually submitted as evidence was, in Candice‘s opinion, “in effect modified”. Vindication is more valuable than remuneration. And not for nothing: even the image she originally shared is modified from the same frame of the video she shared today. Gotta love it when Candace busts herself…
- Aug 20, 202613x their median
Our film, The Shot: Sean Hartman’s Story, is now available to watch for free at https://t.co/wJFPoSX21V No registration required. Just watch and share. Thank you to @Answers4Sean and @RaineyMedia for your hard work the last year as we created then screened this film nationwide.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 116 interactions against 755K followers, an engagement rate of 0.015%. Measured over 65 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 0.592% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.60% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 65 posts sampled, 66% carry an image or video, 29% are part of a thread and 28% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 30K interactions, about 260x its own typical post.
- What is Viva Frei's engagement rate on X?
- Viva Frei (@thevivafrei) has an engagement rate of 0.015%, based on the median interactions across 65 original posts from the last 30 days against 755,298 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.015%, Viva Frei sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,071 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @thevivafrei have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @thevivafrei post?
- Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.6 posts per day across the measured window.