Back to @torontobigface's profile

多伦多方脸 engagement report

@torontobigface - 803K followers on X

Measured over 50 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.157%
of 803K followers
Per impression
0.934%
135K views on a typical post
Reach
16.9%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.3K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.052%
71 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.1/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
03:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 1.3K interactions against 803K followers, an engagement rate of 0.157%. Measured over 50 original posts, its engagement rate beats 78% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 135K times each, and 0.934% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 16.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 50 posts sampled, 38% carry an image or video and 6% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.1K interactions, about 4.8x its own typical post.

Measured over 50 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

多伦多方脸's engagement rate beats 78% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 51% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.157%, 多伦多方脸 sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.08% to 0.433%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.433%
p902.10%
p99160.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,654 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,977 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.433%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 03:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-3%98K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-1%57K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%231K
Monday0%288K
Tuesday-2%278K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%245K
Friday-3%253K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 19, 20264.8x their median

    把社会矛盾,转移到男女对立 真是中共又一伟大发明

    5.0K14489133751K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20264.0x their median

    我现在一刷抖音那是反贼云集 一点开推特,时间线上全是粉红 属实难绷

    4.4K675739382K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20263.8x their median

    马斯克和他妈觉得中国好非常可以理解 中国实际上就是一个极度社达的社会 马斯克作为一个富豪,还是外国富豪,他们在中国的待遇仅次于中共高级老干部 他们又不用吃中国人996的苦,也不用担心中国的未来 但是跟着自豪的你呢?我的朋友? 廉价的中国人,正好是人家快乐的源泉呀

    4.2K15243914405K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20263.2x their median

    中共是不是有点太幼稚了 图1,我的评论区 图2,李老师的评论区 😅😅😅😅 https://t.co/TLA9U90wa8

    3.3K9563014455K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20263.1x their median

    所以不是很理解现在的中共的想法 男女对立,青年压力,导致的生育率爆炸 这件事情中共上心程度不到机器人翻跟头十分之一 习近平对这件事才是真的松弛,到今天也没有出台任何强有力的刺激生育政策 习近平是觉得自己反正也活不到那天,后人自己去解决吗?

    3.1K7378320705K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20262.8x their median

    从一开始清扫火箭军,再到现在的动员法 都指向一件事情,那就是习近平想打台湾 这些明显都是为了打台湾做准备的

    3.0K87466121.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20262.6x their median

    这次中共的救灾表现之拉胯,连小国尼泊尔都不如 结果一看推特上大外宣的发言,我还以为中共开高达来救灾了 丧事喜办,果然一直是中共的特色

    2.8K1003419180K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20262.6x their median

    你要在网上说,要在中国追求民主,自由 小粉红会骂你,说你被洗脑了 但是你要在网上说,中国没有民主,自由 小粉红也会骂你,说你被洗脑了

    2.8K1003294129K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20262.5x their median

    讲道理 看到当年中共怎么从包养老,包看病一起共建美丽社会主义乌托邦 到一夜翻脸让东北人下岗 你就该知道,现在缴纳社保 以后想拿回来,是在做梦 中共的信誉还不如贾跃亭

    2.6K1145013170K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20262.5x their median

    一说反共,就有人说反共没希望,共产党太强了 最终得出不要反的结论 但是这从来不是有没有希望的事情 而是必须要做的事情 那我们可以算一下 习近平今年73岁,习仲勋活了88,齐心活了99 加权一下,再考虑医学进步 习近平正常活个97.98不成问题 那么习近平执政就至少还有25年 25年后,在座的各位都多大了? 很多人幻想,自己不反抗,等习近平死了就好了 问题是25年大家等的了吗? 反共从来就没有能不能的问题 就只有该不该的问题

    2.5K775659436K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.3K interactions against 803K followers, an engagement rate of 0.157%. Measured over 50 original posts, its engagement rate beats 78% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 135K times each, and 0.934% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 16.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 50 posts sampled, 38% carry an image or video and 6% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.1K interactions, about 4.8x its own typical post.

What is 多伦多方脸's engagement rate on X?
多伦多方脸 (@torontobigface) has an engagement rate of 0.157%, based on the median interactions across 50 original posts from the last 30 days against 802,788 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.157%, 多伦多方脸 sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @torontobigface have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 78% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @torontobigface post?
Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going