Back to @trish_regan's profile

Trish Regan engagement report

@trish_regan - 706K followers on X

Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 25, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.016%
of 706K followers
Per impression
0.645%
17K views on a typical post
Reach
2.46%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
112
interactions (median)
Saved
0.011%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.37/day
active 73% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 112 interactions against 706K followers, an engagement rate of 0.016%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 40% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 0.645% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.46% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 27% carry an image or video and 69% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 95K interactions, about 850x its own typical post.

Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 25, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Trish Regan's engagement rate beats 40% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 41% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.016%, Trish Regan sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,134 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.431%
p902.11%
p99161.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,134 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,713 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.431%
90th percentile2.11%
99th percentile161.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-4%49K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%42K
05:00 UTC-4%41K
06:00 UTC-4%47K
07:00 UTC-5%51K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%68K
10:00 UTC-2%71K
11:00 UTC-3%77K
12:00 UTC-2%85K
13:00 UTC-2%93K
14:00 UTC-3%96K
15:00 UTC-2%99K
16:00 UTC-3%96K
17:00 UTC-2%89K
18:00 UTC-2%83K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%73K
21:00 UTC-1%65K
22:00 UTC-1%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%228K
Monday0%281K
Tuesday-2%270K
Wednesday-1%249K
Thursday-2%242K
Friday-3%250K
Saturday+3%225K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jul 17, 2026850x their median

    🚨 NOW: NBC, CBS and ABC face MASS calls to have their FCC privilege licenses reexamined or REVOKED after they refuse to air President Trump's primetime, bombshell address surrounding elections tonight Are they COLLUDING to filter and censor the President of the United States? What are they afraid of?! Good thing X is the media now! IT WILL ALL COME OUT and the people will find out anyway.

    70K21K3.4K9382.8M viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 2026276x their median

    Nothing will prepare you for the national anthem at the first women’s professional baseball game. And I mean nothing. https://t.co/68tCZXvB4Q

    24K2.2K3.8K9033.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 202655x their median

    🇪🇸🇲🇦 Dozens of migrants from the Ceuta surge were transferred to mainland Spain today. The process of moving people from the enclave into the rest of the country continues. Once on the mainland, they'll soon spread into all of Europe. Writer: Oliver https://t.co/OC8RRXnE9z

    4.2K1.6K338117178K viewsView on X
  • Jul 17, 202642x their median

    Rather insane that we need a Primetime Presidential Address to get states to mandate IDENTIFICATION at the voting booths…. We need to insist on voter ids. Period.

    4.2K45637437K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 202628x their median

    It needed to be said. Good US History lesson here from @SenTedCruz https://t.co/B5QXuwRuX2

    2.3K772594047K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20264.2x their median

    Ouch… CNN https://t.co/64ves4Xysr

    3906217538K viewsView on X
  • Jul 12, 20264.2x their median

    Such sad news about Lindsey Graham. I’m stunned to hear it. I remember moderating the Republican presidential debate with him back in 2016. His quick wit made the entire undercard debate a lot more fun. Every time I interviewed him—or simply chatted with him backstage before going on air—I was struck by his unwavering patriotism and deep love for this country. Rest in peace, Senator. 🇺🇸

    3932249110K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20263.9x their median

    JUST IN: The Strait has been DE-MINED and is OPEN per POTUS. He’s even considering making it a U.S. Territory 😉 https://t.co/8xEHuvOn1L

    3433952015K viewsView on X
  • Jul 15, 20263.9x their median

    Who side is Mamdani on? He’s NOT on the side of New Yorkers, NOR on the side of America. And his staff was just caught planning secret meetings with Iran…🤔 https://t.co/MR2S35fqWZ

    313902569.4K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20262.7x their median

    BREAKING: Inflation read comes in TAME. Prices barely up in latest read…. Just 0.1 % for July. Good thing the Fed didn’t hike rates. Chances of an imminent rate hike now coming down.

    2652317117K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 112 interactions against 706K followers, an engagement rate of 0.016%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 40% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 0.645% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.46% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 27% carry an image or video and 69% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 95K interactions, about 850x its own typical post.

What is Trish Regan's engagement rate on X?
Trish Regan (@trish_regan) has an engagement rate of 0.016%, based on the median interactions across 26 original posts from the last 30 days against 706,495 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.016%, Trish Regan sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,134 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @trish_regan have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 40% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @trish_regan post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going