Back to @wallacemick's profile

Mick Wallace engagement report

@wallacemick - 425K followers on X

Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.355%
of 425K followers
Per impression
3.07%
49K views on a typical post
Reach
11.6%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.5K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.059%
29 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.03/day
active 67% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 1.5K interactions against 425K followers, an engagement rate of 0.355%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 86% of 4,293 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 49K times each, and 3.07% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 54% carry an image or video and 60% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 24K interactions, about 16x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #nato, #stopthegame, #forzatoro.

Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026. Recurring tags: #nato, #stopthegame, #forzatoro.

Compared with accounts its own size

Mick Wallace's engagement rate beats 86% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (4,293 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 81% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.355%, Mick Wallace sits above the 50th percentile of the 41,462 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.083% to 0.446%.

p100.002%
p250.013%
p50 (median)0.083%
p750.446%
p902.07%
p99143.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 41,462 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 89,920 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.013%
50th percentile0.083%
75th percentile0.446%
90th percentile2.07%
99th percentile143.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%58K
01:00 UTC-2%59K
02:00 UTC-3%57K
03:00 UTC-4%61K
04:00 UTC-6%49K
05:00 UTC-4%48K
06:00 UTC-5%55K
07:00 UTC-4%59K
08:00 UTC-4%69K
09:00 UTC-4%80K
10:00 UTC-3%83K
11:00 UTC-3%90K
12:00 UTC-2%99K
13:00 UTC-2%108K
14:00 UTC-4%111K
15:00 UTC-2%115K
16:00 UTC-4%112K
17:00 UTC-3%104K
18:00 UTC-2%97K
19:00 UTC-2%92K
20:00 UTC-1%86K
21:00 UTC-1%76K
22:00 UTC-2%65K
23:00 UTC-1%59K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%254K
Monday+2%326K
Tuesday-2%350K
Wednesday-4%312K
Thursday-2%265K
Friday-3%274K
Saturday+3%248K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 14, 202616x their median

    THIS IS FUCKING HORRIFIC. You won’t believe what Israeli bulldozers are doing to the West Bank. They keep destroying entire roads and infrastructure on purpose. Israel wants to make life impossible so Palestinians have no choice but to leave. https://t.co/hoUDoJ4wVA

    14K8.2K739451284K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 202610x their median

    As Arundhati Roy said, what is under the rubble in Gaza is not only the bodies of countless Palestinians killed by Israel, but also the carcass of Western Liberal Democracy... https://t.co/wT1osWln24

    10K4.5K550175325K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20268.6x their median

    If anyone from Hamas said something similar, it'd be plastered on world news 24/7. https://t.co/dCDR2ISXli

    9.3K3.4K217102136K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20267.8x their median

    today is Fidel Castro's 100th birthday. Here he explains why the Zionist Israeli-US empire despises Cuba and is desperate to destroy it: "Our country does not drop bombs on other people and cities. Instead we send doctors to those most lost corners of the world." https://t.co/14zFyI2nOd

    9.3K2.4K6655163K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20265.3x their median

    Not that long ago, everyone had to repeat the mantra that Russia destroying its own pipeline was part of the “Russian playbook.” Anyone who disagreed by suggesting we use common sense was denounced as carrying water for Putin. Our societies would be less radical and gung-ho about war if we could have honest and open debates about the Russiagate hoax, NATO expansionism, and the costs of not allowing dissent.

    5.9K1.9K205106121K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20262.8x their median

    I am appalled that @Columbia has hired Annalena Baerbock @UN_PGA as professor to teach students in global leadership. As German foreign minister, she has supported Israel and publicly endorsed the killing of civilians, including children. https://t.co/bIF3vhUQ1L

    3.1K9671776975K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20262.6x their median

    Last night, the genocidal Zionist regime slaughtered this family and four other Lebanese civilians in southern Lebanon. https://t.co/avbF0YZ9Qd

    2.6K1.2K613059K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20262.5x their median

    The US Blockade of Cuba is Genocide. When are the International Community going to stand up to US and Israeli Terrorism..? https://t.co/PNcYCTacYv

    2.8K929771220K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20262.5x their median

    Much has already been written about the hypocrisy of this letter. But one claim deserves particular attention. The authors repeat the story that Israel struck the ‘transgender section’ of Evin prison, purportedly housing 100 transgender prisoners. This false story circulated internationally after it was reported by the New York Times, before later investigations found no evidence to support it and the key source denied ever making the claim attributed to him. Having spent my PhD years researching HIV in Iran, a subject that necessarily involved studying the legal, social and healthcare realities facing transgender people, I know full well that transgender people are not imprisoned in Iran for being transgender. Iran legally recognises transgender people and permits gender reassignment surgery. Furthermore, there are no dedicated prison wings housing 100 transgender prisoners. Yet people who were willing to uncritically repeat such an implausible story are now writing open letters to Iranian prisoners, as though they possess a deep understanding of the people they claim to write to. It is another reminder of how often narratives about Iran are constructed from assumptions and second-hand mythologies, rather than from serious engagement with realities on the ground. https://t.co/Sav02QXd2I

    2.7K9574783201K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20262.0x their median

    For those still in denial that NATO expansion had anything to do with Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, have a look at declassified files showing Britain’s Ministry of Defence prepared for war with Russia after expanding Nato – 26 years before the invasion. https://t.co/QJWZNkderj

    1.7K96628855358K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#nato#stopthegame#forzatoro#freepalestine#gazagenocide

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.5K interactions against 425K followers, an engagement rate of 0.355%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 86% of 4,293 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 49K times each, and 3.07% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 54% carry an image or video and 60% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 24K interactions, about 16x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #nato, #stopthegame, #forzatoro.

What is Mick Wallace's engagement rate on X?
Mick Wallace (@wallacemick) has an engagement rate of 0.355%, based on the median interactions across 35 original posts from the last 30 days against 424,786 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.355%, Mick Wallace sits above the 50th percentile of the 41,462 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @wallacemick have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 86% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (4,293 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @wallacemick post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going