Back to @wallstreetbets's profile

WallStreetBets engagement report

@wallstreetbets - 2.2M followers on X

Measured over 202 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 30, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.031%
of 2.2M followers
Per impression
0.856%
78K views on a typical post
Reach
3.60%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
670
interactions (median)
Saved
0.024%
18 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
10.67/day
active 103% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 670 interactions against 2.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.031%. Measured over 202 original posts, its engagement rate beats 51% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 78K times each, and 0.856% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.61% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 10.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 202 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 46K interactions, about 68x its own typical post.

Measured over 202 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 30, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

WallStreetBets's engagement rate beats 51% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 43% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.031%, WallStreetBets sits above the 25th percentile of the 217,635 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.148%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.148%
p750.704%
p902.63%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 217,635 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 21,696 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.148%
75th percentile0.704%
90th percentile2.63%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video88% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link11% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 88% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 11% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 122 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 7, 202668x their median

    The best day of my life. I love you ❤️ https://t.co/gp4t60hYpe

    42K8932.6K5204.6M viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 202650x their median

    Big things are coming👀

    27K3.6K1.7K9452.1M viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 202642x their median

    $52M seed round. 15M+ users. But this is what we're most proud of yet. Introducing Drama 3: the most emotive and controllable TTS model in the world And yes, it's open-weight. You can now control how even a single word should sound, change its tone, and shift your voice mid-sentence. Uncle Roger was impressed too. Try it here: https://t.co/4nbz4sQ4yy Comment “DRAMA” within the next 48 hours for 1 month free. If you're an enterprise your first month is on us: https://t.co/jBXXZSAg0p

    17K1.6K8.3K85413M viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 202632x their median

    BREAKING: 🇺🇸 The SEC is preparing to allow US stocks to trade 24/7 on the blockchain. https://t.co/mp1VOdG0Tq

    19K1.9K5533801.7M viewsView on X
  • Oct 29, 202619x their median

    Tether froze more than 1.567B USDT related to a potential Binance exchange hack. Protecting the industry and our partners is our main priority. Stay safe everyone.

    10K1.0K1.1K4591.8M viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 202614x their median

    JUST IN: Bitcoin surges to $84,000 https://t.co/qqH9GRnNH3

    8.4K740369180597K viewsView on X
  • Oct 20, 202614x their median

    An LA hospitality group runs 25 bars, many of them right by Dodger Stadium. Every extra playoff game means packed bars. An early exit means lost revenue they were counting on. So they hedged it. They put $60,000 on Kalshi on the Dodgers *not* making the World Series. The Dodgers lost the NLCS to the Brewers. The position returned nearly 2x, helping cover the playoff business that *never* came. A Columbia law professor told Fortune it works like “a form of bespoke insurance.” Read the full story here: https://t.co/dErQA7mvzK

    8.5K4521681701.9M viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 202613x their median

    JUST IN: BlackRock says AI compute could be tokenized in the future.

    7.0K6016203621.1M viewsView on X
  • Oct 29, 202611x their median

    JUST IN: Crypto market crashing. $SOL falls under $96 $XRP falls under $1.25 $ETH falls under $2,250 $BTC falls under $78,500 Over $600,000,000 in leveraged crypto long positions have been liquidated in the past 30 minutes. https://t.co/nJRKRsOkOv

    5.6K726481265562K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 202610x their median

    America must continue to lead. https://t.co/WUOJHfOWGE

    4.8K7517584721.7M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 670 interactions against 2.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.031%. Measured over 202 original posts, its engagement rate beats 51% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 78K times each, and 0.856% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.61% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 10.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 202 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 46K interactions, about 68x its own typical post.

What is WallStreetBets's engagement rate on X?
WallStreetBets (@wallstreetbets) has an engagement rate of 0.031%, based on the median interactions across 202 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,166,346 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.031%, WallStreetBets sits above the 25th percentile of the 217,635 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @wallstreetbets have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 51% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @wallstreetbets post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 10.67 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going