Back to @weirdlilguys's profile

cats being weird little guys πŸ‘… engagement report

@weirdlilguys - 1.9M followers on X

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
1.95%
of 1.9M followers
Per impression
8.08%
466K views on a typical post
Reach
24.2%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
38K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.291%
1.4K bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.6/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
23:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 38K interactions against 1.9M followers, an engagement rate of 1.95%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 100% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 466K times each, and 8.08% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 24.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.6 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 89% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 402K interactions, about 11x its own typical post.

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

cats being weird little guys πŸ‘…'s engagement rate beats 100% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 99% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 1.95%, cats being weird little guys πŸ‘… sits above the 75th percentile of the 37,071 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.435% to 2.10%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.435%
p902.10%
p99158.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,071 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 105,527 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.435%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile158.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 23:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%71K
10:00 UTC-2%73K
11:00 UTC-3%80K
12:00 UTC-2%88K
13:00 UTC-2%96K
14:00 UTC-4%99K
15:00 UTC-2%103K
16:00 UTC-3%100K
17:00 UTC-2%92K
18:00 UTC-1%86K
19:00 UTC-2%81K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%67K
22:00 UTC-1%58K
23:00 UTC-1%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%234K
Monday0%294K
Tuesday-3%288K
Wednesday-1%253K
Thursday-2%247K
Friday-3%256K
Saturday+3%230K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 12, 202611x their median

    I love Facebook marketplace https://t.co/Zzrnm1b7w2

    372K29K3854436.3M viewsView on X
  • Apr 4, 20268.2x their median

    Una mina estaba stremeando y su gato se puso a leer el chat kjj https://t.co/gGjuXzh9sO

    290K18K2495567.1M viewsView on X
  • May 16, 202613x their median

    tha weighted blanket enjoyer https://t.co/M8DJK0klhx

    286K14K2541963.7M viewsView on X
  • May 19, 20264.9x their median

    2am in bushwick bro had an entire KITTEN SPREAD https://t.co/HfWiDApYYq

    173K11K2614705.2M viewsView on X
  • Jul 8, 20264.9x their median

    pointed at a bug and my cat ate the bug https://t.co/0w6h88llad

    175K7.6K931151.4M viewsView on X
  • Jul 13, 20264.7x their median

    como se siente compartir mi cama con mi gata: https://t.co/cjUgYqBykj

    154K23K2438252.2M viewsView on X
  • May 11, 20264.4x their median

    incredible how cats can detect the softest most sensitive organs in a human body for the sole purpose of standing on them with the weight of the sun concentrated into tiny kitty paws

    149K14K1782781.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20264.1x their median

    got her a decoy laptop so she doesn’t sit on mine while im trying to work https://t.co/9lXouGPcaH

    147K7.8K3042551.3M viewsView on X
  • Apr 21, 20263.5x their median

    She was born in late December, so every day is the longest day she’s ever known and she gets to watch the sun set: https://t.co/EK2Fah04hY

    127K5.6K752081.9M viewsView on X
  • Apr 2, 20262.4x their median

    Picture this: you're half-asleep on a Lufthansa flight when the cabin lights suddenly flip on. Turns out a big orange cat had escaped its carrier and decided to go exploring. Passengers stayed super quiet, flight attendants grabbed flashlights at first, and everyone teamed up to gently catch the fluffy escape artist without freaking it out. In the end, the cat was safe and the whole cabin handled it like pros.

    83K7.8K6581.1K7.1M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 38K interactions against 1.9M followers, an engagement rate of 1.95%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 100% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 466K times each, and 8.08% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 24.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.6 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 89% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 402K interactions, about 11x its own typical post.

What is cats being weird little guys πŸ‘…'s engagement rate on X?
cats being weird little guys πŸ‘… (@weirdlilguys) has an engagement rate of 1.95%, based on the median interactions across 9 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,927,734 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 1.95%, cats being weird little guys πŸ‘… sits above the 75th percentile of the 37,071 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @weirdlilguys have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 100% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @weirdlilguys post?
Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.6 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going