Back to @womensmarch's profile

Women's March engagement report

@womensmarch - 483K followers on X

Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.012%
of 483K followers
Per impression
1.35%
4.4K views on a typical post
Reach
0.9%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
59
interactions (median)
Saved
0.023%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.83/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 59 interactions against 483K followers, an engagement rate of 0.012%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 32% of 3,917 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.4K times each, and 1.35% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.902% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.83 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 96% carry an image or video and 43% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 9.2K interactions, about 156x its own typical post.

Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026. Recurring tag: #abolishice.

Compared with accounts its own size

Women's March's engagement rate beats 32% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,917 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 59% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.012%, Women's March sits above the 10th percentile of the 37,856 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99155.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,856 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 97,248 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile155.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%53K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%52K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%63K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%75K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%90K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-3%101K
15:00 UTC-2%105K
16:00 UTC-4%102K
17:00 UTC-3%95K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%69K
22:00 UTC-2%60K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%238K
Monday0%302K
Tuesday-3%302K
Wednesday-1%257K
Thursday-2%250K
Friday-3%259K
Saturday+3%233K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jul 1, 2026156x their median

    #creativeresistance https://t.co/SJsuPUUhWm

    7.6K1.5K536396K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 202639x their median

    Fifty years ago, Title IX gave girls and women the right to play. Now MAGA wants it gone. First they banned trans girls from school sports. Called it "protecting women." Then they came for college athletes. Now they're coming for the WNBA. This was never about trans women in the W. That's the wedge. Title IX is the prize. The Heritage Foundation called women's sports a "failed experiment," that we belong in yoga class, and at home raising kids. The WNBA was built by Queer & Black women. We can’t let MAGA call our shots. Sign the petition to tell Cathy and the WNBA to hold the line. https://t.co/1SNCmHX9fi

    1.1K2888953781K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202633x their median

    Wrecking women’s sports in the name of protecting them is about as MAGA as it gets. The W doesn’t need any more weirdos inventing a crisis to save us from. P.S. Trans women are women. But it was never really about that. https://t.co/MkcrthJ2Fc

    9651728082426K viewsView on X
  • Jul 4, 20263.3x their median

    🚨 Right Now in Philly 🚨 Veterans are taking to the streets to reject authoritarianism, endless war, and attacks on our freedoms. We refuse to let veterans' service be used to justify cruelty, corruption, and fear. https://t.co/gnsmKGyCRR

    14145523.9K viewsView on X
  • Jun 25, 20262.8x their median

    Yesterday, feminists showed up across the country to fight for the rights we lost when the Dobbs decision gutted Roe v. Wade. Today, we continue the fight. We know bans haven't stopped abortions - they've increased. In abortion ban states, maternal deaths have increased, too, while OB/GYNs are leaving in droves. We refuse to sit back and let it happen.

    12829613.3K viewsView on X
  • Jun 12, 20262.7x their median

    What do you give a sack of sh*t who already has everything? On June 14, we’re setting up Trump-themed porta-potties in D.C. so you can leave his birthday message where it belongs. 💩 His foot soldiers smeared sh*t on the Capitol walls. We know where it goes: in the toilet, not the Oval Office. Happy 80th, Trump. #DumpOnTrump https://t.co/ReQlssJOna

    83344053.9K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 20262.7x their median

    ICE pepper-sprayed a 72-year-old grandmother for standing on a sidewalk. Linda Wolff was exercising her rights by filming ICE agents in Inwood, when one walked up and sprayed her in the face. She told him he should be ashamed. He told her "I'm gonna do it again." She's still recovering, she's suing, and she's not backing down. She still plans to show up, record, and stand on that sidewalk. #abolishICE

    11740318.7K viewsView on X
  • Jun 7, 20262.6x their median

    We rallied at the gates of Epstein's Zorro Ranch. The next day, New Mexico's Survivors' Truth Commission opened its investigation. Now the subpoenas are flying. The FBI, DOJ, Deutsche Bank, JP Morgan, Santa Fe Institute, and Governor's Office are now all required to answer. For too long, survivors were ignored, discredited, and silenced, some for decades. The federal government looked away. New Mexico didn't. Survivors deserve answers. We will not stop until they get them. https://t.co/dtQuzdlwpU

    8365502.0K viewsView on X
  • Jul 9, 20262.4x their median

    Congress can't keep the government open, but 11 members want to tell the WNBA how to referee their games. Tell these 11 members: You don't know ball. You know deceit and distraction. Quit refereeing the WNBA, release the Epstein files, and do the job you were elected to do: https://t.co/MJis0rwIt8 Photo credit: Rachel O'Leary Carmona, Women's March Executive Director

    99331003.3K viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 20262.2x their median

    The death of 19-year-old Pvt. Isabella Gonzales from Carrollton, Texas over the weekend in Jordan brings home the human cost of the MAGA murder regime's war on Iran. An American teenager has been killed. Trump is sacrificing American lives for a war that the American people don’t want. Regional conflict has escalated with no end in sight. Congress must not send another dime to this illegal and immoral war.

    86241828.0K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#abolishice

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 59 interactions against 483K followers, an engagement rate of 0.012%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 32% of 3,917 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.4K times each, and 1.35% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.902% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.83 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 96% carry an image or video and 43% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 9.2K interactions, about 156x its own typical post.

What is Women's March's engagement rate on X?
Women's March (@womensmarch) has an engagement rate of 0.012%, based on the median interactions across 23 original posts from the last 30 days against 483,394 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.012%, Women's March sits above the 10th percentile of the 37,856 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @womensmarch have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 32% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,917 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @womensmarch post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.83 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going