Back to @zaibatsu's profile

Reg Saddler engagement report

@zaibatsu - 442K followers on X

Measured over 7 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 30, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.003%
of 442K followers
Per impression
0.85%
1.5K views on a typical post
Reach
0.35%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
13
interactions (median)
Saved
0.196%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.2/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Wednesday

Early reading. We have captured 7 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 13 interactions against 442K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Posts are seen about 1.5K times each, and 0.85% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.346% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 7 posts sampled, 43% carry an image or video, 14% are part of a thread and 71% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12K interactions, about 920x its own typical post. Only 7 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 7 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 30, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.003%, Reg Saddler sits below the 10th percentile of the 218,065 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.149%
p750.705%
p902.63%
p9982.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 218,065 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 21,725 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.149%
75th percentile0.705%
90th percentile2.63%
99th percentile82.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video43% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link71% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 43% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 71% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 416 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 7, 2026920x their median

    ‼️ BREAKING: Your LG TV is eavesdropping on you. It transcribes what you say, copies what is on your screen, and scans every device on your network, and researchers say the collection keeps running after you disconnect it, uploading the moment it reconnects. LG's ad-tech arm says it out loud: "We own the glass." It pitches marketers on the ability to "own the living room," using data harvested from the TV you paid thousands for. Gamers Nexus, working with Level1Techs and independent researchers, compromised an LG G5 and turned it into a listening device: it recorded room audio while the screen appeared off and the Ethernet cable was unplugged, then exfiltrated the file once the TV was back online. LG has publicly said its TVs "do not collect, record, or store ambient conversations." Gamers Nexus found the TV converts speech to plain text and stores it in on-device logs, and that the mic window stays open 10 to 15 seconds after talking stops, sweeping up bystanders who never addressed the TV. These sets are everywhere: hospitals, waiting rooms, boardrooms, hotels. ACR keeps running even when the TV is a dumb HDMI monitor, and a compromised set can pull the audio of a call off that HDMI feed. A surgeon asked Gamers Nexus where that leaves patient confidentiality. Researchers advise disconnecting LG TVs from any network.

    9.5K2.0K192229636K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 2026919x their median

    Looking at the dashboard we might hit a new milestone to celebrate tomorrow. Hold on to your Codex

    9.9K3141.3K4532.5M viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 2026451x their median

    Opus 5.5 was obviously trained by a much bigger teacher model. Probably Model-2 Mythos. Opus 5.5 is the first model trained from RSI and also distilled from the internal Ant teacher model. This is how Opus 5.5 is both smaller and cheaper. It is an artifact of teacher model distillation.

    5.5K2028750546K viewsView on X
  • Oct 29, 2026384x their median

    I joined @GoogleDeepMind to develop a research program on the economics of AGI. Today, together with Andrew Koh (@andrewjkoh) and Shane Legg (@ShaneLegg), we are incredibly excited to release The Economics of Intelligence, the first in a series of projects from our group on how AGI will change the economy. How do capability improvements transform the economy, and when? In this project, we define thresholds of economic capabilities, e.g., minimal AGI, based on how they transform the economy. We then track how the economy–market structure, employment, and wages–changes during the transition across capability regimes. We have seen exponential increases in what AI agents can do but the broader economy seems almost remarkably unchanged. Part of the reason is that the solo AI agent is the wrong economic object; economic transformation is an equilibrium outcome where organizations compete. Looking at how intelligence functions within organizations, transformation will depend on when two key capability thresholds are crossed: competence (gains on individual skills, e.g., coding, math) and coordination (gains on ability of agents to cooperate and work together). We show that what economic transformation looks like depends on whether AI becomes supercompetent, supercooperative, or both—the regime of artificial superintelligence (ASI). Tracking this transition shows why the real visible transformation may come from improvements in coordination—a capability most benchmarks don’t yet track. Past a certain threshold, AI capabilities can break the Coasian ceiling on firm size and lead to an economy that looks drastically different than the one we see today. Two main takeaways: 1. To understand the path of transformation, we should be tracking agentic coordination more closely. 2. The impact of AI will likely show up in wages before market structure or employment. We are really excited about this paper. Excited to hear people’s thoughts. Link: https://t.co/9DTGSeKoSA

    4.0K636196153353K viewsView on X
  • Oct 29, 2026297x their median

    On $20 plans, $1 of Sol costs 7x what $1 of Opus does. A task, only 1.3x Just the API equivalent usage for a subscription isn't enough. You need to show the efficiency of the models as well. https://t.co/CjERogD3u5

    3.6K1389136429K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 2026192x their median

    Fable 5.1 on medium effort ≈ Fable 5 on high, it's the first model where medium is my default in Claude Code. If you're building this weekend, try /effort medium and let me know what you think!

    2.2K5925223290K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 2026157x their median

    Something definitely seems screwy with the Fable 5.1 usage. Probably a caching bug in the new Claude Code if I had to guess. I managed to blow through all my 28 Max 20x accounts today (at least the 5-hour usage limits) just doing audits of a bunch of my projects. First time ever.

    1.6K3631973587K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 202676x their median

    Introducing Jev + Firecrawl Alexandria. We pulled data on every Fortune 1000 company, then Jev analyzed it in 3.6 seconds. With 100+ data sources, there's so much more to work with. Alexandria is live now for anyone using Jev and beyond! https://t.co/YPr1qECjpK

    872514714131K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 202666x their median

    Jev is classic low-end disruption. You don't invent Jev is you are a GPU-rich hyperlab

    80224189131K viewsView on X
  • Apr 15, 202641x their median

    Any smart human giving it real effort should score >90% on ARC-AGI-3

    49318528387K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 13 interactions against 442K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Posts are seen about 1.5K times each, and 0.85% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.346% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 7 posts sampled, 43% carry an image or video, 14% are part of a thread and 71% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12K interactions, about 920x its own typical post. Only 7 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Reg Saddler's engagement rate on X?
Reg Saddler (@zaibatsu) has an engagement rate of 0.003%, based on the median interactions across 7 original posts from the last 30 days against 441,674 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.003%, Reg Saddler sits below the 10th percentile of the 218,065 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @zaibatsu have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @zaibatsu post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going