Zhu Su engagement report
@zhusu - 617K followers on X
Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 1.2K interactions against 617K followers, an engagement rate of 0.19%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 80% of 3,899 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 89K times each, and 1.31% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 14.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.57 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 45% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 28K interactions, about 24x its own typical post.
Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Zhu Su's engagement rate beats 80% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,899 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 60% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.19%, Zhu Su sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,701 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.081% to 0.439%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.081% |
| 75th percentile | 0.439% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 156.3% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 53K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 53K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 52K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 55K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 44K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 43K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 50K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 54K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 63K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 72K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 75K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 81K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 98K |
| 14:00 UTC | -3% | 101K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 105K |
| 16:00 UTC | -4% | 102K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 95K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 88K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 83K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 77K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 69K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 60K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 53K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 238K |
| Monday | 0% | 302K |
| Tuesday | -3% | 302K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 257K |
| Thursday | -2% | 250K |
| Friday | -3% | 259K |
| Saturday | +3% | 233K |
Best tweets
- Aug 4, 202624x their median
Life when you start using Chinese AI https://t.co/EJhnbiYSQW
- May 13, 202616x their median
The reason why Trump is insanely popular in Beijing specifically is because the air quality becomes Swiss-like for a month going into each time he comes.
- Aug 23, 202613x their median
This is ridiculous. These are terms you ask for from an enemy after defeating them in a world war. That is how the USA now treats its 'allies'. And that is why every country in its right mind wants out of the relationship. https://t.co/dt6gTzGWAh
- May 25, 20265.5x their median
Enhanced Games might be the most effective “don’t do drugs” campaign ever.
- Aug 12, 20264.4x their median
my grandfather wrote a memoir that I couldn't read after he passed, I tried to learn Chinese but progress was slow this year, I translated it with AI and designed a bilingual edition. it turned out way better than I could have imagined https://t.co/HpAYSZunKQ
- Jul 17, 20263.0x their median
Alibaba owns 35% of Moonshot (Kimi)
- Aug 11, 20262.0x their median
A Note to Our Users Manus will soon resume operating as an independent company. As part of this transition and to comply with regulatory requirements in specific jurisdictions, some users will need to back-up their data before 7:59 a.m. on August 23, 2026 (SGT) and then begin restoration starting from 8:00 a.m on August 25, 2026 (SGT) to ensure normal usage. More information can be found in the blog post and we’ve provided detailed guides, including to understand if you’re affected, in our Help Center For affected users, these are the key details: We’ll notify you by email and in the Manus app. If you signed up with an Apple ID or Facebook account, please check your in-app notifications. Back up your data from now until August 23 (SGT) before 7:59 a.m. You can back up more than once, you can create new data after backing up, just run it again. Starting from 8:00 a.m. on August 25 (SGT), the restoration portal will open. Restore your data and pick up right where you left off. Affected users will not be charged during the transition, and we will be providing welcome back bonuses. If your account is not affected, you don’t need to do anything - keep using Manus as usual. You’ll get an in-app notification confirming this. For those affected, we know this is disruptive and we’re sorry for the inconvenience. Supporting you through it is our top priority. In addition to the full guides in the Help Center, our customer service team is ready to help 24/7 with any questions. As we look ahead, we couldn’t be more excited by the future. We’re preparing a series of new features that will push the boundaries of what’s possible for general AI agents once again. Thank you for being with us as we go through this process together. The best is still ahead.
- Aug 19, 20261.7x their median
My take on society and crypto is really simple. If you have societal level investment, you are accountable for societal level returns. Things are not getting better. We said we have "AI warfare". We are locked in a stalemate with a 3rd world dictatorship who closed the Strait of Hormuz. We were having debates on autonomous weapons. Tell Claude to Open the Strait. He's tired. He needs a nap. His safety settings won't allow him to. But trust me, he could. We're too ethical to let him. Sure. Every airline invested maximally in software automation. And more recently AI support. The airports are more poorly run. The flights don't leave on time. Uber maxed out its Anthropic spend. Countless apps did the same. The apps are not better despite the investment. They go down in prod all the time. People think GDP is going to grow 4.4% per Patrick Collison's survey. I think it will grow about 2%. Anthropic points to high ARR. I think most of that will churn to lower cost models. What will happen next is AI labs will point to unfalsifiable bull cases, similarly to Elon pointing to Data Centers in Space. "Do you know how big the sun is? That's the TAM of Spacex". Similarly - the de-facto Anthropic/OpenAI bull case will be "biological advancement". This both seems like you're curing cancer. At the same time as creating a legislative emergency. "Open source models need to be banned to prevent another COVID". That is the planned narrative and always has been. I don't know if Chinese Open Source models will be banned. I think, probably, if it starts looking like China is competing with ASML and Nvidia. But then, of course, it will be too late. Less ambiguous. There will be a surge in the American Left. My basic thesis is about religion. Because Dario and his Cabal will push too hard on Transhumanism, with biological vaccines. It will alienate the Christian right. "You're playing god with the human genome." Once the Christian right is alienated, Roe v Wade doesn't really work You don't need the profound story to play out. Inflation is high. Trump violated his campaign promises. He said no wars. We are at war. He's visibly declining. You think Thiel is staking out Argentina because he thinks we're getting President Vance? A bit on bio advancement. Some of it might be real. But getting drugs into production is hard. We don't know what a bio utopia looks like. What if it's personalized medicine? A treatment just for you. Who do you test it on? Do you need synthetic humans? Do you know how to underwrite that. I don't. We're already facing a huge lab monkey shortage. It will get worse. I'm not saying AI can't develop drugs. I'm saying that it might take years longer than data center investment cycles for that to translate into meaningful revenue required for justifying societal scale investment. And it's not all curing cancer. At first AI results in huge amounts of hacking. But soon enough it results in perfect code. On all public protocols. Darwinian evolution of all Open Source tech. Do you trust the dev team at SUI more or the Bank of Hawaii's cracked team? The market is betting the ranch on the back office IT departments of regional banks to keep money safe. It will be a fucking nightmare of hacking that's already here in crypto and will hit every other sector regardless of open source AI bans. At the same time, once it's clear that AI investments aren't turbo charging corporate earnings. Stocks will start to drop. More addictive use cases of AI will be deployed at scale. Incentivized gambling. Pornography. Enhancements to the algorithm. Better video games. Video game companies have been memory constrained due to corporate use cases. Once companies stop being rewarded for spending 1/2 their R&D budget on tokens, compute frees up for video. These addictive use cases: roleplaying, personalized worlds - will hit productivity further. White collar workers will become more cooked. Big Tech firms are already hiring way less Gen Z workers. Many overly AI reliant kids can't do basic analysis. Maybe it's because covid messed everyone up. Who knows. The 'silver lining' of AI will be that it'll get good enough to replace a lot of white collar jobs. But the resulting performance will be kind of at par with the last generation of coherent people. So you'd rather hire Claude than a zoomer. But it will also kind of suck. But it's not like there will be zero ROI. There is $16.6 T of payroll. 10% will get cut. $1.6T of 'savings'. It won't be good for consumption. By the time it is clear that GDP won't accelerate, the bond market will start to go into free fall. The Fed will act. This will cause Gold to rip, getting the ultra rich thinking about capital flight. Meanwhile - we have a boom in on-chain tokenization. And it's not just "hey look there's an asset on a blockchain nobody users". The majority of the top 15 perps on Hyperliquid are stocks. Centralized exchanges are seeing booming volumes. The US government has repeatedly stated it wants more USD stablecoins. And the primary use case (at least by profit if not by transaction volume) of USD stablecoins is as collateral for perpetual swaps. This is rational. During periods of high inflation and debt uncertainty, backstopping large buyers of US treasuries such as Tether is smart. This push towards stablecoins will undermine the perceived sovereignty of Europe, who will develop CBDCs to compete in digital payments. AI coding will speed up CBDCs. The Norgesbank is vibe coding a CBDC right now. Claude is on the commits which are pouring in each day. CBDCs are unpopular right now because they put the government directly in charge of credit. Who are we kidding. The government is, and has been the lender of first resort since 2008. SVB was part 1 of the mask coming off. The narrative will be that regional banks are no longer suited for the AI economy. Once CBDCs launch there will be a second wave of tokenization. Right now it's a US phenomenon. But the US is ironically not the biggest beneficiary of tokenization because we have such liquid equity capital markets. Due to the mundane reason that it's efficient to move corporate finance on-chain. Fixed income will find its way onto mirrored assets on public chains. Foreign exchange is one of the largest retail markets on earth. There are virtually no non USD stables. That will change. Then there will be big, liquid FX markets and fixed income markets traded with leverage and looped on chain. Tokenized equities do not offer a much better UX than stocks on IBKR. Tokenized debt will be vastly better in terms of capital efficiency and UX. Corporate debt - I'd argue, is the single worst UX in all of finance. So what do I think is going to happen: Hopes will be crushed. The fiscal problems associated with surging yields will become front in center just as it becomes clear that the plan for dealing with them is not AGI but rather asset confiscation. Capital flight will accelerate. At the same time, unlike previous crypto bull runs - there will be a lot of corporate PMF that will drive fees across on-chain ecosystems, and improving tech that has been battle hardened from years of AI onslaughts just as the rest of the world is just realizing that all the encryption problems in crypto are problems everywhere else too Countries like Singapore, the UAE and Switzerland will capitalize on regulated trading of bearer assets. Capital will flow to these places both because of laws, and high personal safety risks associated with these things. Stocks are at parabolic highs versus crypto. The things I am saying are far from consensus. Right now, people view crypto as a failed financial Stanford Prison Experiment. Trad VCs ask for restructurings or to remove crypto investors from your cap tables. Even the big ones. There's public shaming. Most people have quit the space. One investor reached out to me. He seemed surprised I was still grinding. I guess everyone else spent investor money, checked out, rugged, or pivoted to AI. It's obviously not easy seeing your friends get rich. People around you questioning your sanity. "Believe in something" is what they used to say. Yea man. I'm not here because I believe. I'm here because I don't have faith in a failed system run by criminals. Metastasized discontent congealing into red candles. Faithless stares. Monotonous code reviews. Years of opportunity cost Nihilists who sold their dreams for bags of currency representing a system they despite that will never accept them no matter how many 'pivots' they have For me - it's just back to 2 simple questions. Question 1: We invested awesome amounts of money. Is everything awesome as a result? Question 2: Do you think the system that elevated Jeffrey Epstein to the pinnacle of society is going to let you become an immortal because of AI generated bio therapeutics? I know my answers. And I act accordingly. Do you?
- Feb 5, 2026
Now that reasoning by analogy is allowed, for the incoming new cycle: eth -> performs like btc last cycle sol -> performs like eth last cycle hype -> performs like sol last cycle lit -> performs like sui last cycle
- Aug 10, 2026
A good litmus test for whether you live in a free society is whether you can enjoy Chinese EVs.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 1.2K interactions against 617K followers, an engagement rate of 0.19%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 80% of 3,899 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 89K times each, and 1.31% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 14.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.57 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 45% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 28K interactions, about 24x its own typical post.
- What is Zhu Su's engagement rate on X?
- Zhu Su (@zhusu) has an engagement rate of 0.19%, based on the median interactions across 11 original posts from the last 30 days against 616,894 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.19%, Zhu Su sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,701 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @zhusu have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 80% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,899 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @zhusu post?
- Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.57 posts per day across the measured window.