Zilliqa engagement report
@zilliqa - 447K followers on X
Measured over 3 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026.
Engagement
Early reading. We have captured 3 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.
A typical post picks up 257 interactions against 447K followers, an engagement rate of 0.057%. Posts are seen about 47K times each, and 0.542% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.37 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 3 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video and 67% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 335 interactions. Only 3 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
Measured over 3 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026. Recurring tag: #bitrue.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.057%, Zilliqa sits above the 25th percentile of the 217,973 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.149%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.149% |
| 75th percentile | 0.705% |
| 90th percentile | 2.63% |
| 99th percentile | 82.5% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 33% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 67% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 33% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 67% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 826 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 25, 2026
To our community: Zilliqa has engaged a leading firm from the crypto space, specialised in cybersecurity and AI-driven attacks, to assist us in investigating the situation. We are taking this extremely seriously.
- Apr 3, 2026
We’re hosting a trading competition on Omni with over $20,000 in prizes! The competition will rank users based on their PnL and volume, using a new in-app leaderboard. Keep reading to see rules & prizes 👇 https://t.co/HeI276DOBP
- Mar 5, 2026
We’re introducing zUSDC via XBridge on Zilliqa. This moves USDC liquidity onto Zilliqa-operated infrastructure, improving reliability while keeping stablecoin liquidity flowing across the ecosystem. Here’s what’s changing and what it means for USDC users: https://t.co/R5XV5tau2L
- Oct 16, 2026
Following the security incident involving the Zilliqa Ledger app, we worked with major exchanges to coordinate the migration of ZIL to Zilliqa EVM. This included South Korea’s five major exchanges: Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Gopax and Korbit. Throughout this process, we responded to the questionnaire and subsequent follow-up questions from the Digital Asset eXchange Alliance (DAXA), the self-regulatory organisation representing these exchanges. After several months of coordination, we are disappointed by Upbit and Bithumb’s decisions to delist ZIL. However, we appreciate that both exchanges are supporting ZIL withdrawals on Zilliqa EVM, allowing holders to move their funds without completing the migration manually. For holders on Upbit and Bithumb, there are two withdrawal options: - Withdraw to a self-custody wallet, such as @MetaMask or @Rabby_io. Add the Zilliqa EVM network using the official network details (https://t.co/Cd5KrPoPUO), then use your wallet’s Zilliqa EVM receiving address. - Withdraw to another exchange that supports Zilliqa EVM, such as Binance or KuCoin. Check that ZIL deposits are enabled and select the correct network before transferring. Please check each exchange’s official notices for withdrawal deadlines and instructions. Before transferring, confirm that your destination supports Zilliqa EVM and, if sending to another exchange, that ZIL deposits are enabled. If you experience any withdrawal issues, contact the support team of the exchange you are withdrawing from. Send a small test transfer first and confirm it has arrived before moving the rest of your ZIL balance.
- May 1, 2026
Zilliqa mainnet will undergo a scheduled upgrade with the release of v0.21.0, introducing improvements to performance, security, and validator infrastructure. Key upgrades: • State pruning • RANDAO support • Deposit contract upgrade (v8) • Flexible checkpoint versioning Timeline: • Deposit_v8 activation - Block 25,902,000 (~May 5, 08:37 UTC) • RANDAO activation - Block 25,905,600 (~May 5, 09:49 UTC) All Validators have already been notified and they have upgraded nodes. If you haven’t yet - please upgrade at earliest. Community: No action required. Funds remain SAFU. More details: https://t.co/83DT09chxw
- Jul 2, 2026
Institutional blockchain finance settles first, checks compliance after. That's the wrong order. Zilliqa runs the check before - on any chain or settlement rail. We've published the roadmap: https://t.co/GQ5nPNC8O7 https://t.co/S49nuAD0ml
- Mar 19, 2026
Community Update #2 Over the past few weeks, Zilliqa has been focused on strengthening the foundation - from X-Bridge to identity (vLEI) and stablecoin flows. Markets may be cooling off, but the real work hasn’t slowed down. Find more here: https://t.co/bMdy3zlgFX https://t.co/DR0CDMJN1R
- Jul 20, 2026
We have been made aware of a security incident involving one of our exchange partners, in which ZIL was stolen from a cold wallet. The incident is under active investigation, and we are working with the relevant parties to establish the root cause and full scope. As a precaution, all exchanges have been notified and asked to temporarily pause ZIL deposits and withdrawals to prevent the stolen funds from being moved or sold through centralised platforms. We understand the community will have questions. We will share further updates as soon as we have verified information. Please rely only on official Zilliqa channels for updates.
- Jul 7, 2026
Last October, @ltin_li and Zilliqa started building together. Today that becomes a full strategic partnership. LTIN issues the verifiable organisational identity; Zilliqa runs the neutral check that confirms both parties are permitted before a transaction settles, beside it, on any chain. Identity without enforcement is a document; enforcement without a sovereign issuer is a guess. Trust as shared infrastructure. In active development. https://t.co/ikN0ZAh7yV
- Jul 16, 2026
You can add compliance software to a settlement chain. You cannot move the permission step earlier than the chain's own definition of a valid transaction. New writing on why the ordering is architectural, not optional, and where LTIN-issued identity fits beside Zilliqa's check. https://t.co/CiG0VlovlZ
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 257 interactions against 447K followers, an engagement rate of 0.057%. Posts are seen about 47K times each, and 0.542% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.37 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 3 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video and 67% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 335 interactions. Only 3 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
- What is Zilliqa's engagement rate on X?
- Zilliqa (@zilliqa) has an engagement rate of 0.057%, based on the median interactions across 3 original posts from the last 30 days against 447,249 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.057%, Zilliqa sits above the 25th percentile of the 217,973 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @zilliqa have real engagement?
- There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
- When does @zilliqa post?
- Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.37 posts per day across the measured window.